IV Current Development Work
Author:
Mr. Tamim Bayoumi
Search for other papers by Mr. Tamim Bayoumi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Hamid Faruqee
Search for other papers by Mr. Hamid Faruqee in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Douglas Laxton
Search for other papers by Mr. Douglas Laxton in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Philippe D Karam
Search for other papers by Mr. Philippe D Karam in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Alessandro Rebucci
Search for other papers by Mr. Alessandro Rebucci in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Jaewoo Lee
Search for other papers by Mr. Jaewoo Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Benjamin L Hunt
Search for other papers by Mr. Benjamin L Hunt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Mr. Ivan Tchakarov
Search for other papers by Mr. Ivan Tchakarov in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

GEM continues to be developed. Primarily, this reflects the enormous amount of work currently being done in academia using new open economy models to reexamine a range of issues, whose insights can provide ideas for how to improve GEM. In addition, as discussed earlier, the strong theoretical structure makes it complicated to add new features. This section discusses active development work on fiscal policy and international asset markets, including emerging market financing constraints. These areas have been chosen because of their relevance to the work of the IMF, in line with the overall philosophy underlying GEM.

GEM continues to be developed. Primarily, this reflects the enormous amount of work currently being done in academia using new open economy models to reexamine a range of issues, whose insights can provide ideas for how to improve GEM. In addition, as discussed earlier, the strong theoretical structure makes it complicated to add new features. This section discusses active development work on fiscal policy and international asset markets, including emerging market financing constraints. These areas have been chosen because of their relevance to the work of the IMF, in line with the overall philosophy underlying GEM.

Fiscal Policy

Fiscal policy remains an important macroeconomic lever for stimulating the economy and has been used actively in recent decades (see Figure 4.1). The main issue associated with this is the degree of Ricardian equivalence. Full Ricardian equivalence implies that changes in taxes and transfers have no impact on aggregate demand (as is currently the case in GEM). This is because consumers discount the future using the interest rates on government paper, so the value of tax cuts and subsequent tax increases offset each other, and people will fully offset a tax cut by higher saving. There are two main ways of creating more realistic short-term tax multipliers. One is to assume that some individuals act as if they do not have access to financial markets, but rather vary their consumption in line with their disposable income. Such rule-of-thumb consumers can be easily incorporated into existing models and provide a way of examining income distribution issues, but their behavior is highly mechanical, responding as much to a temporary tax cut as to a long-term one. The alternative is to assume that consumers have finite lives, adding a life-cycle dimension to consumption. This provides more realistic consumption dynamics, with spending responding less to a temporary tax cut than a long-term one as predicted by the permanent income hypothesis, but at the cost of adding considerable theoretical complexity. In addition, the supply-side effects of fiscal policy can be incorporated by adding distorting taxes. The explicit modeling of labor and product markets makes this an easy addition in GEM, in contrast to earlier models.

Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1.

Structural Fiscal Balances in the Major Economic Regions

(General government as a percentage of potential output)

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.

The plan is to adopt a two-track approach to incorporating fiscal policy into GEM. The main model will be altered to include distorting taxes and rule-of-thumb consumers, but not those with finite lives. Such a framework provides a reasonable way of dealing with changes in fiscal balances resulting from disturbances elsewhere in the model by taking account of the impact of automatic stabilizers. The second track involves developing an alternative version of the model that can be used to examine fiscal issues in more detail by incorporating finite-lived consumers with a simplified version of the rest of the economy based on the existing GEM framework. Adding such consumers with higher discount rates into the current GEM is extremely difficult, as its life-cycle implications are inconsistent with the assumption that consumer behavior can be calculated from the actions of a single representative individual, greatly complicating the theoretical structure. Early prototypes of both models have been created.

International Asset Markets

Gross holdings of other countries’ assets and liabilities have been rising rapidly across industrial countries in recent years as financial deregulation has reduced barriers to such transactions (Figure 4.2).3 This provides a new mechanism for transmission of the international cycle, as disturbances to future prosperity of domestic firms affect other countries through equity prices, reducing idiosyncratic shocks across countries and increasing the synchronization of the global business cycle.

Figure 4.2.
Figure 4.2.

Sum of International Assets and Liabilities in Major Advanced Economies

(In percent of GDP)

Source: IMF, Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook.

International models with strong theoretical foundations have generally assumed either that international asset markets are complete or that they are limited to transactions in a single bond (Lane, 2001). Complete markets imply that movements in consumption across countries should be highly correlated, responding little to country-specific changes in domestic output, predictions that are so different from the existing evidence that few policy models have adopted this approach. Rather, they have tended to assume that one bond is the only asset traded across countries, which eliminates the need to model demand across different assets. This was the structure in MULTIMOD and in the current version of GEM. However, globalization of financial markets is making this structure increasingly problematic.

The staff has been developing a prototype theoretical model in which all countries issue domestic debt and equity that can be traded in international markets (similar work is also being undertaken by others). Different payment profiles create demand for each asset and, it turns out, a higher rate of return for equities than bonds. Home bias in holding assets is modeled by assuming that there is a cost to holding each asset, and these costs are higher for foreign assets than their domestic equivalents. These costs can also be used to explain the inability of emerging markets to issue debt in domestic currency by assuming that the costs of foreigners holding such debt is extremely high. Initial simulations indicate that the addition of a wider range of assets produce more realistic cross-country correlations of countries’ consumption. Once the properties of this prototype model have been more fully investigated, the next stage will be to transfer the approach to GEM.

Another important issue in international asset markets is that for most emerging market countries access is constrained, costly, and volatile (Figure 4.3). In addition, access for specific countries often becomes expensive or constrained just when they would normally want to borrow because of short-term domestic difficulties. Among other consequences, constrained access means that fiscal policies become procyclical in economies where governments are highly dependent on foreign borrowing.

Figure 4.3.
Figure 4.3.

Capital Constraints for Emerging Markets

Sources: J.P. Morgan; and IMF, World Economic Outlook.

There has been a large amount of recent work in the new open economy macroeconomic and related literature examining how to best characterize emerging market borrowing constraints. Much of this work has used the concept of the financial accelerator (Bernanke, Gertler, and Gilchrist, 1999). The cost of borrowing for a firm is inversely related to its net worth, so borrowing is increasingly difficult when the firm faces adverse shocks.4 This provides a reason why balance sheets matter for monetary policy transmission. It has been used to model domestic financial markets and banking systems, and has also been transferred to the analysis of foreign borrowing by emerging market countries, with the main issue being how to define net worth. Work on adding a financial accelerator to GEM is proceeding, with a particular focus on the consequences of limited access of emerging market countries to international financial assets.

Cited By

  • Collapse
  • Expand
A New International Macroeconomic Model
  • View in gallery
    Figure 4.1.

    Structural Fiscal Balances in the Major Economic Regions

    (General government as a percentage of potential output)

  • View in gallery
    Figure 4.2.

    Sum of International Assets and Liabilities in Major Advanced Economies

    (In percent of GDP)

  • View in gallery
    Figure 4.3.

    Capital Constraints for Emerging Markets

  • Altig, D., L. Christiano, M. Eichenbaum, and J. Linde, 2003, “Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations” (unpublished).

  • Balassa, Bela 1964, “The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, pp. 58496.

  • Bayoumi, Tamim, Douglas Laxton, and Paolo Pesenti, 2004, “Benefits and Spillovers of Greater Competition in Europe: A Macroeconomic Assessment,ECB Working Paper No. 341 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernanke, Ben, Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist, 1999, “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle,in Handbook of Macroeconomics, ed. by John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Charles Evans, 2001, “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy,NBER Working Paper No. 8403 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corsetti, Giancarlo, and Luca Dedola, 2002, “Macroeconomics of International Price Discrimination,Temi de Discussione, No. 461 (Rome: Bank of Italy).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1976, “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 6, pp. 116176.

  • Erceg, C., L. Guerrieri, and C. Gust, 2003, “SIGMA: A New Open Economy Model for Policy Analysis,draft paper prepared for the Annual Central Bank Modelers’ Workshop in Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleming, J. Marcus, 1962, “Domestic Financial Policies Under Fixed and Under Floating Exchange Rates,Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 9 (November), pp. 36979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galí, J., M. Gertler, and J. D. López-Salido, 2002, “Markups, Gaps, and the Welfare Costs of Business Fluctuations,NBER Working Paper No. 8850 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, Robert E. 1978, “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp. 97187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hart, Oliver, and John Moore, 1994, “A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 84179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, Benjamin L., and Alessandro Rebucci, 2003, “The U.S. Dollar and the Trade Deficit: What Accounts for the Late 1990s?IMF Working Paper No. 03/194 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2000, “The Impact of Higher Oil Prices on the Global Economy;available via the Internet at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/oil/2000/oilrep.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2001, “Business Cycle Linkages Among Major Advanced Economies,World Economic Outlook, October 2001, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2003a, “How Concerned Should Developing Countries Be About G-3 Exchange Rate Volatility?World Economic Outlook, September 2003, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2003b, “United States: Selected Issues,IMF Country Report No. 03/245 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kollman, Robert, 2002, “Monetary Policy Rules in the Open Economy: Effects on Welfare and Business Cycles,CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3279 (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kydland, Finn E., and Edward C. Prescott, 1982, “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations,Econometrica, Vol. 50 (November), pp. 134570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lane, Philip R., 2001, “The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: A Survey,Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54 (August), pp. 23566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laxton, Douglas, and Paolo Pesenti, 2003, “Monetary Rules for Small, Open, Emerging Economies,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 110946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1976, “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masson, Paul R., Steven A. Symansky, and Guy Meredith, 1990, MULTIMOD Mark II: A Revised and Extended Model, IMF Occasional Paper No. 71 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mendoza, Enrique G., 1991, “Real Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy,American Economic Review, Vol. 81 (September), pp. 797818.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mundell, Robert A., 1963, “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates,Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 29, pp. 47585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muth, J.F., 1961, “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,Econometrica, Vol. 29, pp. 31535.

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, 2001, “International Macroeconomics: Beyond the Mundell-Fleming Model,IMF Staff Papers, Special Issue, Vol. 47, pp. 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Obstfeld, Maurice, Kenneth Rogoff, 1995, “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, pp. 62460.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1997, The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform, Vol. II: Thematic Studies (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Samuelson, Paul A., 1964, “Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems,Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 46, pp. 14554.

  • Schadler, Susan M., Paulo F. Drummond, Louis Kuijs, Zuzana Murgasova, Rachel N. van Elkan, 2004, Adopting the Euro in Central Europe: Challenges of the Next Step in European Integration, IMF Ocasional Paper No. 234 (Washington: International Monetary Fund; forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smets, Frank and Raf Wouters, 2002, “An Estimated Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area,ECB Working Paper No. 171 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, John 1993, “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice,Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 39 (December), pp. 195214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation