2. Statistical Definition of Foreign Direct Investment
Author:
Mr. Neil K. Patterson
Search for other papers by Mr. Neil K. Patterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ms. Marie Montanjees
Search for other papers by Ms. Marie Montanjees in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Colleen Cardillo https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396 International Monetary Fund

Search for other papers by Colleen Cardillo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Mr. John Motala
Search for other papers by Mr. John Motala in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

2.1 The BPM5 defines FDI as a category of international investment that reflects the objective of a resident in one economy (the direct investor) obtaining a lasting interest in an enterprise resident in another economy (the direct investment enterprise). The lasting interest implies the existence of a long-term relationship between the direct investor and the direct investment enterprise, and a significant degree of influence by the investor on the management of the enterprise. A direct investment relationship is established when the direct investor has acquired 10 percent or more of the ordinary shares or voting power of an enterprise abroad.

2.1 The BPM5 defines FDI as a category of international investment that reflects the objective of a resident in one economy (the direct investor) obtaining a lasting interest in an enterprise resident in another economy (the direct investment enterprise). The lasting interest implies the existence of a long-term relationship between the direct investor and the direct investment enterprise, and a significant degree of influence by the investor on the management of the enterprise. A direct investment relationship is established when the direct investor has acquired 10 percent or more of the ordinary shares or voting power of an enterprise abroad.

2.2 Direct investment comprises not only the initial transaction establishing the FDI relationship between the direct investor and the direct investment enterprise but all subsequent capital transactions between them and among affiliated enterprises resident in different economies. The key concepts in the measurement of FDI are elaborated in Chapter 5.

2.3 There are a number of popular misconceptions about FDI.

  • FDI does not necessarily imply control of the enterprise, since only a 10 percent ownership is required to establish a direct investment relationship.

  • FDI does not constitute a “10 percent ownership” (or more) by a group of “unrelated” investors domiciled in the same foreign country—FDI involves only one investor or a “related group” of investors in one or more countries.

  • FDI is not based on the nationality or citizenship of the direct investor—FDI is based on the residence of the direct investor.

  • Borrowings by direct investment enterprises from unrelated parties abroad that are guaranteed by direct investors are not FDI.

2.4 Statistics that measure the operations of the foreign affiliates of multinational enterprises—such as sales, employment, and assets—do not form part of the traditional balance of payments and international investment position (IIP) statistics,1 which capture only the net investment of the direct investor in foreign affiliates. Statistics on the operations of foreign affiliates are referred to as foreign affiliate trade statistics. In recent years, the relevance of statistics on the operations of foreign affiliates has been acknowledged, and efforts are under way to encourage and assist countries in compiling these data. The new interagency Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services, published in 2002 by the United Nations, provides a framework for developing foreign affiliate trade in services statistics (United Nations and others, 2002). Other organizations—notably the OECD and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)—maintain databases on the activities of foreign affiliates. Box 2.1 highlights some of the types of data produced on the activities of foreign affiliates. The discussion of FDI in this report focuses on the traditional balance of payments and IIP statistics.

Foreign affiliate trade statistics measure the operations of affiliates of foreign firms in an economy and the operations of the affiliates of domestic firms that are domiciled abroad. Typically, the data cover the majority-owned affiliates (ownership of more than 50 percent). The United States has, for many years, compiled data in this area of statistics, and other countries, such as Canada and France, have more recently begun to produce them. Many other industrial countries, as well as Eurostat, OECD, and UNCTAD, are doing work in this area. At present, except in the area of services transactions, there are no internationally agreed guidelines on how foreign affiliate trade statistics should be recorded.

Foreign affiliate trade statistics complement the residency-based foreign direct investment statistics of the balance of payments in that they provide a measure of the impact of direct investment on an economy. Questions that can be addressed include: How much employment do foreign affiliates generate in the host economy? What levels of sales and types of sales are generated by foreign affiliates? How much does intrafirm trade contribute to world trade? What are the sources of financing in addition to cross-border flows from the direct investor or affiliates that are part of the parent group? How much of the value added generated in an economy can be attributed to foreign affiliates?

The data in the table show global FDI balance of payments and IIP data compared with some of the additional level of detail available through foreign affiliate trade statistics (outward investment).

article image
Sources: Balance of payments data—IMF’s Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2002, Part 2, Table B-24; international investment position data—UNCTAD’s World Investment Report, Annex Table B-3; and foreign affiliate trade statistics—UNCTAD’s World Investment Report 2002, Table I.1.

The data are extrapolations based on the shares of a very limited number of countries covered in the worldwide outward FDI stocks.

1

The IIP is the balance sheet of the stock of external financial assets and liabilities. The terms “stocks” and “positions” are used interchangeably in this report.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Trends, Data Availability, Concepts, and Recording Practices
  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), 2003, Statistics of Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN, Comprehensive Data Set, 2002 Edition (Jakarta).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements, Commonwealth Secretariat, Eurostat, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris Club Secretariat, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, and World Bank, 2003, External Debt Statistics: Guide for Compilers and Users (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canada, Statistics Canada, 2002, Canada’s Balance of International Payments, Vol. 49, No. 4 (Fourth Quarter 2001), Catalogue 67-001 (Ottawa).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canada, Statistics Canada, 2003, Foreign Direct Investment, Daily, March 26, 2003, Table 376-0051 (CANSIM) (Ottawa). Available via the Internet: http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/030326/d030326a.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Nederlandsche Bank, 2003, “Monetary and Financial Statistics for the Netherlands.” Available via the Internet: http://www.statistics.dnb.nl/indexuk.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eurostat, 2002, European Union Foreign Direct Investment Yearbook 2001 (Luxembourg).

  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 2001, External Direct Investment Statistics of Hong Kong 2001 (Hong Kong SAR: Census and Statistics Department).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1987, Report on the World Current Account Discrepancy (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1992, Report on the Measurement of International Capital Flows (Washington); also known as the Godeaux Report.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1993, Balance of Payments Manual, fifth edition (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1995, Balance of Payments Compilation Guide (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1996, Balance of Payments Textbook (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 2000, Financial Derivatives: A Supplement to the Fifth Edition of the Balance of Payments Manual (Washington).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2002a and various issues, Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 2002b, “Classification of Financial Derivatives Involving Affiliated Enterprises in the Balance of Payments Statistics and the International Investment Position (IIP) Statement.” Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/fd/2002/fdclass.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2002c, Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey Guide, second edition (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 2002d, “Direct Investment Methodology: Latest SIMSDI (Survey of Implementation of Methodological Standards for Direct Investment) Metadata,” individual country metadata and cross-country comparison tables. Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/di/mdb97.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2002e, International Investment Position: A Guide to Data Sources (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 2002f, “Recommended Treatment of Selected Direct Investment Transactions.Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/di/fditran.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2002g, World Economic Outlook (Washington, September).

  • International Monetary Fund, 2003, International Financial Statistics, October 2003 issue (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003, Foreign Direct Investment Statistics: How Countries Measure FDI, 2001 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Japan, Bank of Japan, 2002, Balance of Payments Monthly (Tokyo).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1996, OECD Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment, Third Edition (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001, International Direct Investment Statistics Yearbook, 1980–2000 (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002, International Investment Perspectives (Paris).

  • United Kingdom, Office for National Statistics, 2003, “Net Earnings from Foreign Direct Investment in the U.K.Available via the Internet: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, and World Trade Organization, 2002, Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services (Geneva, Luxembourg, New York, Paris, and Washington).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2002, World Investment Report, Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2003, World Investment Report, FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2003, Foreign Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002 Report (Santiago).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 1995, Survey of Current Business (Washington, March).

  • United States, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2002, Survey of Current Business (Washington, July and September).

  • United States, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2003, Globalization and Multinational Companies: What Are the Questions, and How Well Are We Doing in Answering Them? (Washington, June). Available via the Internet: http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/papers/Globalization.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation