3 Defining, Measuring, and Predicting Soundness
Author:
Mr. Matthew I. Saal 0000000404811396 https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396 International Monetary Fund

Search for other papers by Mr. Matthew I. Saal in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Carl-Johan Lindgren
Search for other papers by Mr. Carl-Johan Lindgren in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Ms. G. G. Garcia 0000000404811396 https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396 International Monetary Fund

Search for other papers by Ms. G. G. Garcia in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

Bank soundness is a concept commonly used to denote, for example, an ability to withstand adverse events. Nevertheless, its usage is typically imprecise and gives rise to questions regarding its definition, measurement, and prediction.

Bank soundness is a concept commonly used to denote, for example, an ability to withstand adverse events. Nevertheless, its usage is typically imprecise and gives rise to questions regarding its definition, measurement, and prediction.

Defining a Sound Banking System

A sound banking system may be defined as one in which most banks (those accounting for most of the system’s assets and liabilities) are solvent and are likely to remain so. Solvency is reflected in the positive net worth of a bank, as measured by the difference between the assets and liabilities (excluding capital and reserves) in its balance sheet. In other words, the distance between soundness and insolvency can be gauged in terms of capitalization, since net worth is equivalent to capital plus reserves. The likelihood of remaining solvent will depend, inter alia, on banks’ being profitable, well managed, and sufficiently well capitalized to withstand adverse events. In a dynamic and competitive market economy, efficiency and profitability are linked, and their interaction will indicate the prospects for future solvency. Inefficient banks will make losses and eventually will become insolvent and illiquid.6 Undercapitalized banks, that is, those with low net worth, will be fragile in the sense of being more prone to collapse when faced with a destabilizing shock, such as a major policy change, a sharp asset price adjustment, financial sector liberalization, or a natural disaster.

It is difficult to precisely classify a banking system as “sound” or “unsound,” because there is no benchmark measure of systemic insolvency that determines when a banking system is unsound or when a crisis will occur. Banking systems may exhibit different degrees of vulnerability over time. They may be functioning poorly, or may be working relatively well now but exhibit signs (e.g., low earnings or capitalization) of probable future problems or potential crises. Nonetheless, having no precise classification does not detract from the usefulness of the concept of soundness, proxied by solvency, any more than the difficulty of precisely defining concepts like a realistic exchange rate or a sustainable balance of payments has barred the application of those useful notions.

Measuring Unsoundness

Accepting the usefulness of a definition is one thing; practical application from a macroeconomic policy perspective is another. Using current solvency as a proxy for the soundness of a banking system abstracts from important measurement and projection issues.

While solvency is straightforward to define, it is difficult to measure. Bank loans, which represent the bulk of bank assets in most countries, are extremely difficult to value; that is one reason why even in countries with well-developed capital markets bank loans are not readily traded or securitized.7 From an economic standpoint, insolvency results when the present value of the expected stream of future net cash flows becomes negative and exceeds capital. Obviously, a high reported level of nonperforming loans would indicate fragility. However, there is always an element of judgment in projecting and valuing uncertain future receipts. In addition, owners and managers of unsound banks have incentives to accrue unearned income and show loans as performing in order not to lose their bank. Thus, balance sheet figures on asset value and on nonperforming loans may not represent a bank’s actual circumstances. Assessing insolvency is further complicated by off-balance-sheet items and problems of consolidating the balance sheets of bank subsidiaries and other related financial units.

These weaknesses in information explain why banking problems emerge with little apparent warning even in the most advanced countries. Even the combined resources of external auditors, credit rating agencies, stock market analysts, and supervisors may not spot banking problems in time.

To the extent that it can be measured, solvency can be aggregated across banks; clearly a banking system in which a large portion of banks are insolvent at current valuation would be unsound. Aggregation across banks, however, may mask problems. For example, a key payments center bank whose net worth is slightly negative might have more significant systemic implications than a savings bank with a highly negative net worth.

Predicting Unsoundness

Apart from the difficulties in measuring current solvency is the additional complexity that the concept of a sound banking system should encompass its dynamic development and its susceptibility to shocks. Solvency is essentially a static concept: it characterizes a bank (or a banking system) at a point in time. A forward-looking measure of banking system health should capture the determinants of bank insolvency, which include poor asset quality and earnings, as well as less quantifiable factors such as management weaknesses, failures of internal and external control, and the potential impact of exogenous events. Thus, if a significant portion of bank profits derives from speculative activities, or if bank governance structures are such that they facilitate high-risk transactions, such as related-party lending, the probability of future insolvency will be higher.

Predicting Unsoundness at Individual Banks

Supervisors in some countries have constructed sets of indicators to provide an early warning that a particular bank is likely to experience difficulties. These indicators consist principally of bank-specific information provided by the reports banks make to the supervisory authority (“call reports”). Early warning indicators are usually used to determine where scarce supervisory resources would best be deployed in on-site examination.

Bank-reported data are often used in conjunction with complementary statistics from other sources and qualitative indicators, many of which are based on supervisory inspections. To the extent that bank data are inaccurate, the quality of such indicators and models is impaired. Even in such circumstances, though, the data may contain significant information: for example, an increase in loans past due provides a warning, even if such loans are systematically underestimated. Thus, specific indicators and trends derived from bank statistics, along with complementary data and judgment, can help to predict bank unsoundness.

Where data are available, some supervisors have constructed more complex econometric models to identify where severe problems are likely to develop. These empirical models identify factors that raise or reduce the probability of bank insolvency in any period. The characteristics of an individual bank can then be fed into the estimated equation to gauge the bank’s soundness. The relevant characteristics are mostly bank specific, but may also incorporate sectoral information (such as the concentration of the local banking market) and macroeconomic information (such as the regional unemployment rate). Supervisors then use the results of these models to identify banks that warrant greater supervisory attention, for example, in the form of more frequent on-site inspections.

There has been considerable published academic work in this area as well.8 Again, models try to predict whether a particular bank is likely to experience difficulties, often defined as insolvency. Published work has focused on the additional question of predicting failure, which is distinct from insolvency. Insolvency is determined by events in the banking market; a bank either is insolvent or is not. Failure in most cases hinges upon a supervisory decision, which may or may not be taken, and may be taken before or after insolvency. Failure usually depends on the same variables that determine insolvency, but as a regulatory decision, failure is subject to misincentives, forbearance, and political interference. Thus, the likelihood of insolvency and the timing of failure may hinge on different factors.

Insolvency should be the dependent variable in empirical exercises, but because banks are difficult to value, market value insolvency may not be observed or measured except after failure. Nevertheless, since regulators and other analysts all define an unsound bank in a similar fashion (focusing principally on insolvency), comparable sets of variables are used in most approaches. One key difference is that models used by regulators have access to a bank’s prior supervisory ratings. For example, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Financial Institutions Monitoring System (FIMS) uses prior composite supervisory ratings as one of the predictors of future ratings and risk of failure.9 Such information is not normally available to outside investigators. While they do have access to some of the data underlying supervisory ratings, such as capital and earnings data, they would not normally have access to information on management and asset quality derived from on-site examinations. Research by supervisors has shown that using data from on-site inspections and from reports submitted by banks results in more accurate forecasts than relying on either alone; FIMS provides one example. In practice, however, supervisors tend to watch a larger number of variables than those identified by researchers.10 Despite the difficulties, models using publicly available data have been successfully formulated and applied.

Research has generally concluded that a small number of variables can accurately identify at an early stage those individual banks that will ultimately become insolvent (while avoiding incorrectly flagging banks that will survive). A summary of some of the variables used is provided in Table 1, along with the expected direction of the effect of each variable on the probability of insolvency.

Table 1.

Early Warning Indicators of the Probability of Bank Insolvency

article image
article image

Similar variables have been grouped together; for example, for capital adequacy, studies use various versions of capital/assets. These are not shown separately.

This column indicates the direction of effect that an increase in each explanatory valuable is expected to have on the probability of bank insolvency. Thus, for example, a better on-site rating of management would be expected to correlate with a lower probability of insolvency. The direction of effect of some individual variables will depend also on other factors; these variables are idicated as +/−.

Financial Institutions Monitoring System. See Cole, Cornyn, and Gurther (1995).

As surveyed in Demirguc-Kunt (1989).

These variables include traditional measures of capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, and liquidity. The impact of macroeconomic conditions on banks is captured in some of the variables used. Recognizing that a bank will not remain well capitalized unless it operates efficiently, some models also include measures of operating efficiency. Assessing efficiency through financial performance indicators, such as earnings relative to assets or relative to employees, requires some control for market structure; a monopolist may be inefficient but still show high earnings. Thus some studies have included market structure variables as well.

Most of the anticipated effects are straightforward, but some are complex. In general, supervisors should be concerned about banks with unusually high or low financial ratios. For example, a high capital-to-asset ratio, which will cause a low rate of return on equity (ROE), may lead to hostile takeover activity that can have positive or negative implications for bank soundness, while a low capital ratio implies a high probability of failure. A low loan-to-asset ratio implies that banks are not carrying out their intermediation role and may be involved in other, possibly speculative, activities, whereas a high ratio indicates high exposure to credit risk.

Much of the published work in this area has focused on the United States, whose large banking sector, extensive recent experience with bank failures, and well-developed statistical reporting systems have provided abundant data. Translating this work to other banking environments will require further research. Since the basic financial operations of banking are the same across countries, the sets of relevant variables would be expected to be similar. It must be recognized, however, that in many countries individual bank data do not exist, or are inaccurate and outdated, presenting such a large errors-in-variables problem as to call into question the validity of any empirical estimates of the probability of insolvency for those economies.

A different approach to gauging insolvency has recently been adopted by a number of researchers. If financial markets can assess a bank’s value, and the market price for equity reflects it, then an asset pricing model can be used to infer the risk of insolvency that the market has assigned to each bank. The capital asset pricing model was applied by Hall and Miles (1990) to assess bankruptcy risk for several U.K. banks and for a set of U.S. banks, including a subset that subsequently did fail. Clare (1995) used an arbitrage pricing model based principally on macroeconomic variables to estimate the probabilities of failure among individual U.K. merchant banks. Fischer and Gueyie (1995) applied an option pricing model to estimate the implied variance of bank assets in a number of countries that had liberalized their financial systems. The asset pricing approach has the advantages of using data that are publicly available, principally market prices for bank securities, and of incorporating the information inherent in financial market prices (see Table 1). However, to the extent that financial markets are less than fully informed and efficient, the inferences drawn from these models may be insufficient as an early warning of bank unsoundness (for a critical view, see Simons and Cross (1991)).

Predicting Systemic Unsoundness

Relatively little empirical work has been done on predicting systemic unsoundness. In part this is because supervisors use a bottom-up approach; they are concerned initially with individual banks, and the system is then viewed as the sum of all banks. Most early warning models focus on predicting problems at individual banks and require access to bank-specific data. There is potential, however, to measure or project systemic banking problems from aggregate economic data as well. Three possible approaches to predicting systemic unsoundness are summarized here, followed by a brief review of some recent literature.

Bottom-Up Approach

A bottom-up approach to systemic soundness estimates the probability of insolvency developing for each individual bank in the economy, based, for example, on a balance sheet model. These data then provide the basis for constructing a distribution of bank assets by probability of insolvency. A concern for systemic stability would be warranted when the probability of insolvency becomes significant for a large proportion of the country’s banking assets, or when that probability increases substantially in any period of time. The critical range is a matter of judgment and will depend in part on the risk-aversion of the supervisor or policymaker undertaking the evaluation.

While a full distribution provides a more complete picture, a single measure of the condition of the banking system might be constructed as an asset-weighted probability of insolvency based on the probability of insolvency for each bank. The sum of asset-weighted probabilities will range between zero (when all banking assets are housed in banks with no probability of insolvency) and 100 (when all the nation’s banking assets are in banks with a probability of insolvency equal to 1).

The principal drawback to applying this methodology is that sufficient bank-specific data to estimate the underlying model are not readily available for most countries. A secondary drawback is that it does not systematically take into account the different functions that banks may play in a market, and the degree of interaction between banks. Banks with certain functions, such as key payments centers, may be more important to the functioning of the system than simple asset weighting shows. The degree of interaction between banks, for example, interbank market exposure or overlapping exposure to certain sectors, will determine the extent of potential domino or contagion effects.

Aggregative Approach

Given the difficulty in obtaining bank-by-bank data, it might be useful to estimate the probability of systemic insolvency using aggregate banking sector data, which are often published by central banks or other official statistical sources. The approach here would be to apply a model based on single bank characteristics similar to those summarized in Table 1 to a synthetic aggregate bank. In this case, the model would have to be developed using cross-sectional data from countries with similar financial systems, since time-series data for a single country might not provide sufficient instances of systemic insolvency to establish the necessary econometric relationships. The model could then be applied to the aggregate bank data to determine the probability of systemic insolvency for that system.

One significant drawback to this approach is that aggregation may hide problems. For example, while the capital-to-asset ratio is used as an indicator of individual bank condition, it is not possible to adequately assess the strength of the banking sector as a whole by looking at an average, even an asset-weighted average of the capital-to-asset ratio. Two banking systems each with ten equally sized banks might have an average capital-to-asset ratio of zero percent. In one system, each bank could have zero capital and so offer the public no sound banking options. The other might consist of half the banks with capital ratios of 10 percent and the other half with minus 10 percent. This system offers sound options to the public. Thus a distribution of bank assets by capital ratio is needed to assess the vulnerability of the banking system to systemic crisis. When a significant proportion of banking assets is held by undercapitalized or insolvent banks, the banking system would be considered unsound. An aggregate measure, however, would not always provide this information.

Another drawback would be the difficulty in estimating the model from cross-country data. First, as noted, defining systemic insolvency presents a number of challenges, although one might alternatively focus on predicting the extent of likely undercapitalization. Second, legal, regulatory, financial infrastructure, political and even cultural factors come into play in determining the degree to which a bank may be subject to losses, runs, and failure. Direct comparability across countries will be difficult to establish, but analysis using countries with similar economic structures or at similar stages of development might yield worthwhile insights.

Macroeconomic Approach

Banks are derivative institutions in that their health reflects the health of their customers, which in turn reflects the health of the economy as a whole. Instead of looking at bank balance sheet data for internal sources of unsoundness, it should be possible to establish systematic relationships between economywide variables and an indicator of bank soundness, such as capitalization. A number of macroeconomic variables would be expected to affect the banking system or reflect its condition. Indeed, some of the models summarized in the first columns of Table 1 employ macroeconomic variables to predict problems at specific banks. One would expect these same variables to be significant for the soundness of the system as a whole.

Broadly speaking, these macroeconomic factors can be grouped as indicators of macroeconomic conditions and indicators of financial fragility. The former group would include GDP and sectoral growth rates, indices of industrial activity, and indicators of macroeconomic balance, such as capital account, current account, and fiscal balances. For example, if an economy or certain important sectors are in a prolonged recession, there is cause for concern about the soundness of the banking system; indicators of macroeconomic conditions would be relevant in these cases.

Indicators of financial fragility would include data on money and credit, interest rates, asset price indices, consumer credit, corporate indebtedness, and bankruptcy rates. For example, excessive credit growth relative to GDP and rapid rises in asset prices have been associated with a weakening of the quality of bank portfolios and an increase in risk exposure. Indicators of systemic distress would include frequent requests by banks for liquidity support and a tiered interbank market. Qualitative variables reflecting the political situation, legal and financial infrastructure, and regulatory environment might also be useful barometers in that the resilience of banking systems will depend to a significant degree on the framework in which they operate, as discussed in Part III.

Data availability for most of these variables should be high. Some researchers have looked at the history of banking crises in a particular country over time; an example is Gorton (1988), who studied the national banking era in the United States (1865-1914), during which there were numerous panics. Under current institutional structures in most countries, estimation of an insolvency probability model at the systemic level would again require cross-country data. Such an approach might provide a means of estimating the impact of particular events, such as a fall in asset prices, on the banking system as a whole. Where bank-specific data are available, macroeconomic factors could be applied to individual banks to derive their sensitivities to particular factors. Even where bank-specific data are not available, some insight into the sensitivity of the banking system as a whole to these factors could be derived from aggregate data, as described (and subject to the caveats noted) above.

Recent Literature

Recent literature has begun to look systematically at banking crises across countries with a view to better understanding the contributing factors. The methodology applied has been a case study approach: examples of countries that have experienced crises are selected, and common macroeconomic trends surrounding the crises are analyzed. The papers in Sundararajan and Baliño (1991) and the studies of Baer and Klingebiel (1995), Caprio and Klingebiel (1996), and Garcia (1994 and 1995) identify a number of the macroeconomic and financial fragility variables listed above as contributors to banking sector crises. The analysis of these studies is largely retrospective, focusing on explanation rather than prediction.

A few recent works have taken a more forward-looking view. Mishkin (1994) attempts to outline signals that a financial crisis is in prospect.

These include declines in stock prices, increases in interest rates and corporate indebtedness, and unanticipated declines in inflation. Hausmann and Gavin (1995) note that loan delinquencies are lagging indicators, and focus instead on macroeconomic shocks to asset quality and bank funding, and the role of credit booms in fostering financial fragility. Kaminsky and Reinhart (1996) focus on the links between balance of payments and banking crises and conclude that financial liberalization helps to predict banking crises across a range of countries, although this may be due to selection bias. As precursors, they identify recessionary conditions, declining economic activity, export sector weakening, sinking asset prices, rapid credit expansion, reversals of capital inflows, increases in the money multiplier, and high real interest rates. Fischer and Gueyie (1995) use a combination of bank balance sheet, macroeconomic, and policy variables to explain changes in bankruptcy probability (as gauged by an option pricing model).

Some of the variables that have been characterized by these studies as contributing to the emergence of a crisis are listed in Table 1. The studies are largely qualitative; no formal model to predict the onset of a crisis or the emergence of an unsound system has been estimated. An appropriate set of early warning signals will vary across countries, depending on the quality and availability of banking and macroeconomic data, and the specific institutional setting. However, as guides to policy these studies are important contributions. The logic underlying the importance of the identified macroeconomic factors is explored further in the next chapters.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Akhtar, M.A., “Causes and Consequences of the 1989-92 Credit Slowdown: Overview and Perspective,” Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 18 (Winter 1993-94), pp. 1 –23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alexander, William E., Tomás José T. Baliño and Charles Enoch, eds., The Adoption of Indirect Instruments of Monetary Policy, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 526 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alexander, William E., and Francesco Caramazza, “Money Versus Credit: The Role of Banks in the Monetary Transmission Process,” in Frameworks for Monetary Stability, ed. by Tomas J. T. Baliño and Carlo Cottarelli (Washington: International Monetary Fund,1994), pp. 397 —422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, Linda, and Anthony Saunders, “Forbearance and Valuation of Deposit Insurance as a Callable Put,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17 (June 1993), pp. 629 –43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Relationship Between Bank Supervisors and External Auditors (New York, July 1989).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aoki, Masahiko, and Hugh Patrick, eds., The Japanese Main Bank System: Its Relevance for Developing and Transforming Economies (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baer, Herbert, and Daniela Klingebiel, “Systemic Risk When Depositors Bear Losses: Five Case Studies,” in Banking, Financial Markets, and Systemic Risk, Vol. 7 of Research in Financial Services Private and Public Policy, ed. by George G. Kaufman (Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1995), pp. 195 –302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements, Report of the Committee on Interbank Netting Schemes of the Central Banks of the Group of Ten Countries (Basle, November 1990).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements, Delivery Versus Payment in Securities Settlement Systems (Basle, September 1992).

  • Bank for International Settlements, Central Bank Payment and Settlement Services “with Respect to Cross-Border and Multi-Currency Transactions (Basle, September 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements, Report of the Steering Group on Settlement Risk in Foreign Exchange Transactions (Basle, December 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank of England, “Is There a Credit Crunch?” Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, Vol. 31 (May 1991), pp. 256 –59.

  • Bank of Japan, “Characteristics of Interest Rate Indicators,” Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of Japan, Vol. 2 (November 1994), pp. 35 –62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barker, David, and David Holdsworth, “The Causes of Bank Failures in the 1980s,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Research Paper No. 93-25, August 1993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, Report on the Supervision of Banks’ Foreign Establishments (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, September 1975).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, “Principles for the Supervision of Banks’ Foreign Establishments” (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, May 1983).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, Report on International Developments in Banking Supervision, No. 9 (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, September 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, “Communique” (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, December 1995).

  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, “Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks” (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, January 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beany, Anne, Sandra L. Chamberlain, and Joseph Magliola, “Managing Financial Reports of Commercial Banks: The Influence of Taxes, Regulatory Capital and Earnings,” The Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Paper No. 94-02, August 1993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benston, George J., “Federal Regulation of Banking: Historical Overview,” in Deregulating Financial Services: Public Policy in Flux, ed. by George G. Kaufman and Roger C. Kormendi (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1986), pp. 1 –48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berg, Jesper, “The Nordic Bank Crisis—Lessons to Be Learned” (unpublished, Washington: July 1995).

  • Berglöf, Erik, “Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: The Theory and Its Policy Implications,” in Corporate Governance in Transitional Economies: Insider Control and the Role of Banks, ed. by Masahiko Aoki and Hyung-Ki Kim (Washington: The World Bank, 1995), pp. 59 –95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blum, Jürg, and Martin Hellwig, “The Macroeconomic Implications of Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks,” European Economic Review, Vol. 39 (1995), pp. 739 –49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bockelmann, Horst, “Comments [on Goodhart],” in Financial Stability in a Changing Environment, ed. by Kuniho Sawamoto Zenta Nakajima, and Hiroo Taguchi (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), pp. 498 –505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonin, John P., Banking in the Transition: Privatizing Banks in Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic, issue paper for Institute for East West Studies, Comparative Privatization Project, State Withdrawal: Creating Market-Oriented Banking Sectors for the Economies in Transition (London, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, December 4—5, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borish, Michael S., Millard Long, and Michel Noël, Restructuring Banks and Enterprises, World Bank Discussion Paper, No. 279 (Washington: The World Bank, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bosworth, Barry, “Institutional Change and the Efficacy of Monetary Policy,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 1 (1989), pp. 77 –110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brinkmann, Emile J., and Paul M. Horvitz, “Risk-Based Capital Standards and the Credit Crunch,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 27 (August 1995), pp. 848 –63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brock, Philip L., ed., If Texas Were Chile: A Primer on Banking Refonn (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1992).

  • Brunner, Karl, and Allan M. Meltzer, “Money and Credit in the Monetary Transmission Process,” Ametitan Economic Review, Vol. 28 (May 1988), pp. 446 –51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calvo, Guillermo A., and Fabrizio Coricelli, “Credit Market Imperfections and Output Response in Previously Centrally Planned Economies,” in Building Sound Finance in Emerging Market Economies, ed. by Gerard Caprio, David Folkerts-Landau, and Timothy D. Lane (Washington: International Monetary Fund and World Bank, 1994), pp. 257 –94.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calvo, Guillermo A., and Morris Goldstein, “Crisis Prevention and Crisis Management after Mexico: What Role for the Official Sector?” paper presented at the Institute for International Economies Conference on Private Capital Flows to Emerging Markets after the Mexican Crisis, held in Vienna, Austria, September 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calvo, Guillermo A., and Manmohan S. Kumar, “Money Demand, Bank Credit, and Economic Performance in Former Socialist Economics,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 41 (June 1994), pp. 314 –49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cantor, Richard, and John Wenninger, “Perspective on the Credit Slowdown, Quarterly Review,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 18 (Spring 1993), pp. 3 –36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caprio, Gerard Jr., and Daniela Klingebiel, “Bank Insolvency: Bad Luck, Bad Policy, or Bad Banking?” paper presented at the World Bank Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, April 25 –26, 1996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carse, David, “Market Entry and Asset Quality,” Quarterly Bulletin, Hong Kong Monetary Authority (February 1995), pp. 42 –49.

  • Chari, V. V, Larry E. Jones, and Rodolfo E. Manuelli, “The Growth Effects of Monetary Policy,” Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Vol. 19 (Fall 1995), pp. 18 –32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clair, Robert T, Joanna O. Kolson, and Kenneth J. Robinson, “The Texas Banking Crisis and the Payments System,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (First Quarter 1995), pp. 13 –21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clare, Andrew D., “Using the Arbitrage Pricing Theory to Calculate the Probability of Financial Institution Failure,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 27 (May 1995), pp. 920 –26.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, Rebel A., and Jeffrey W. Gunther, “Separating the Likelihood and Timing of Bank Failure,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 19 (September 1995), pp. 1073 –89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, Rebel A., Barbara G. Cornyn, and Jeffrey W. Gunther, “FIMS: A New Monitoring System for Banking Institutions,” Federal Reserve Bulletin (January 1995), pp. 1 –15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cottarelli, Carlo, and Angeiiki Kourelis, “Financial Structure, Bank Lending Rates, and the Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 41 (December 1994), pp. 587 –623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dale, Richard, “International Banking Regulation,” in International Financial Market Regulation, ed. by Benn Steil (Chichester; New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994), pp. 1 –15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Gregorio, José, and Pablo E. Guidotti, “Financial Development and Economic Growth,” IMF Working Paper 92/101 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, December 1992).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Juan, Aristóbulo, “Does Bank Insolvency Matter? And What to Do About It?” Economic Development Institute of the World Bank Working Paper (Washington: Economic Development Institute of the World Bank, 1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Nederlandsche Bank, “Memorandum on the Role of the Supervisory Board of a Bank,” December 31, 1986, Quarterly Bulletin (Amsterdam: De Nederlandsche Bank, December 1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Demirgiic-Kunt, Asli, “Deposit-Institution Failures: A Review of Empirical Literature,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Vol. 25 (Fourth Quarter 1989), pp. 2 –18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diamond, Douglas W., and Phillip H. Dybvig, “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91 (June 1983), pp. 401 –19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dimsdale, Nicholas, “Banks, Capital Markets, and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 10 (Winter 1994), pp. 34 –48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dittus, Peter, Corporate Governance in Central Europe: The Role of Banks, BIS Economic Paper, No. 42 (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, August 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dooley, Michael P., and Peter Isard, “The Role of Incentives and Planning in Market-Oriented Transition,” in Finance and the International Economy 6, ed. by Richard O’Brien (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 19 –31

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Stanley Fischer, Macroeconomics (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 6th ed. 1994).

  • Drees, Burkhard, and Ceyla Pozarbaşioğlu, “The Nordic Banking Crises: Pitfalls in Financial Liberalization,” IMF Working Paper 95/61 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, June 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dziobek, Claudia, “Regulatory and Tax Treatment of Loan Loss Provisions,” IMF Papers on Policy Analysis and Assessment 96/6 (Washington: International Monetary Fund 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dziobek, Claudia, Olivier Frécaur, and María Nieto, “Non-G-10 Countries and the Basle Capital Rules: How Tough a Challenge Is It to Join the Basle Club?” IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment 95/5 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, March 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Union, Directive 95/26/EC of the European Parliament and Council Directive, Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L 168/7 (June 29, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Union, Directive 77/780CEE of the European Parliament and Council Directive, Official Journal of the European Communities, No. L322/30 (December 12, 1977).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faig-Aumalle, Mliquel, “Implications of Banking Market Structure for Monetary Policy: A Survey,” IMF Working Paper 87/25 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, April 1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fairlamb, David, “Beyond Capital,” Institutional Investor, Vol. 19 (August 1994), pp. 16 –26.

  • Fama, Eugene E. “What’s Different About Banks?” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 15 (January 1985), pp. 29 –39.

  • Fidler, Stephen (1996a), “IMF urged to do more in monitoring banking,” Financial Times, March 26, 1996, p. 4.

  • Fidler, Stephen, (1996b), “IMF urged to be bolder in fight to stem bank crises,” Financial Times, March 27, 1996, p. 6.

  • Fischer, Klaus P., and Jean-Pierre Gueyie, “Financial Liberalization and Bank Solvency,” paper presented at the symposium on Business Finance in Emerging Markets, held at the University of Laval, Quebec, August 31-September 1, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischer, Stanley, “International Capital Flows, the International Agencies and Financial Stability,” in Financial Stability in a Changing Environment, ed. by Kuniho Sawamoto, Zenta Nakajima, and Hiroo Taguchi (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), pp. 26 –37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Folkerts-Landau, David, Takatoshi Ito, and others, International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Policy Issues, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeland, Charles, “The Work of the Basle Committee,” in Current Legal Issues Affecting Central Banks, Vol. 2, ed. by Robert C. Effros (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1994), pp. 231 –40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fries, Steven M., and Timothy D. Lane, “Financial and Enterprise Restructuring in Emerging Market Economies,” in Building Sound Finance in Emerging Market Economies, ed. by Gerard Caprio, David Folkerts-Landau, and Timothy D. Lane (Washington: International Monetary Fund and World Bank, 1994), pp. 21 –46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galbis, Vicente, “Financial Sector Reforms in Eight Countries: Issues and Results,” IMF Working Paper 95/141 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, December 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galbis, Vicente, “High Real Interest Rates Under Financial Liberalization: Is There a Problem?” IMF Working Paper 93/7 (Washington: International Monetary Fund,January 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garcia, Gillian, “Comparing and Confronting the Recent Banking Problems in Indonesia, Turkey, and Venezuela” (unpublished, Washington: International Monetary Fund, December 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garcia, Gillian, “Lessons from Bank Failures Worldwide,” paper presented at the conference on Regulating Depository Institutions, held at Koȩ University, Istanbul, November 3, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garcia, Gillian, “Deposit Insurance: Obtaining the Benefits and Avoiding the Pitfalls,” IMF Working Paper 96/83 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, August 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garcia, Gillian, and Matthew I. Saal, “Internal Governance. Market Discipline, and Regulatory Restraint, “in Rethinking Bank Regulation, proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, May 1996 (Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gertler, Mark, “Financial Structure and Aggregate Economic Activity: An Overview,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 20 (August 1988, Part 2), pp. 559 –88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilbert, R. Alton, and Sangkyun Park, “Value of Early Warning Models in Bank Supervision,” draft working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldstein, Morris, and others (1993a), International Capital Markets: Part I: Exchange Rate Management and International Capital Flows, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldstein, Morris, and others, (1993b), International Capital Markets: Development, Prospects, and Policy Issues, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1992).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodfriend, Marvin, “Money, Credit, Banking, and Payments System Policy,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (January/February 1991), pp. 7 –23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guodhart, Charles, “Price Stability and Financial Fragility,” in Financial Stability in a Changing Environment, ed. by Kuniho Sawamoto, Zenta Nakajima, and Hiroo Taguchi (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gorton, Gary, “Banking Panics and Business Cycles,” Oxford Economic Papers, No. 40 (December 1988), pp. 221 –55.

  • Griffith-Jones, Stephany, “Introductory Framework,” in Financial Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. by Stephany Griffith-Jones and Zdenĕk Drábek (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), pp. 3 –15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guitián, Manuel, “A Neglected Dimension of Monetary Policy” (unpublished, Washington: International Monetary Fund, January 25, 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guide, Ann-Marie, “Liquid Asset Ratios—An Effective Policy Tool?” IMF Monetary and Exchange Affairs Department Operational Paper 95/04 (unpublished, Washington: International Monetary Fund, May 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, Stephen, and David Miles, “Monitoring Bank Risk: A Market Based Approach,” Birkbeck College Department of Economics Discussion Paper in Financial Economics FE-3/90 (April 1990), pp. 1 –19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hargraves, Monica, and Garry J. Schinasi, “Monetary Policy, Financial Liberalization, and Asset Price Inflation,” Annex I in World Economic Outlook (Washington: International Monetary Fund, May 1993), pp. 81 –95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausmann, Ricardo, and Michael Gavin, “The Roots of Banking Crises: The Macroeconomic Context,” paper presented at the Inter-American Development Bank Conference on Banking Crises in Latin America, held in Washington, October 6-7, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hinds, Manuel, “Economic Effects of Financial Crises,” Policy, Planning, and Research Working Paper, No. 104 (Washington: World Bank, October 1988).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Annual Report (Hong Kong, 1994).

  • International Accounting Standards Committee, International Accounting Standards (Rochester, England: The Stanhope Press, 1995).

  • International Monetary Fund, Theoretical Aspects of the Design of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs, IMF Occasional Paper, No.55 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, September 1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, “The Special Data Dissemination Standard: Standards for the Dissemination by Countries of Economic and Financial Statistics” (Washington: International Monetary Fund, April 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, Manual on Monetary and Financial Statistics (Washington: International Monetary Fund, forthcoming in mid-1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaffee, Dwight, and Mark Levonian, “Russian Banking,” in Weekly Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 95-35 (October 20, 1995), pp. 1 –3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James, Christopher, “Some Evidence on the Uniqueness of Bank Loans,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 19 (December 1987), pp. 217 –35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • James, Harold, International Monetary Cooperation Since Bretton Woods (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).

  • “Japan Lifts Another Veil,” The Banker, November 1995, p. 8

  • Johnston, R. Barry, “Distressed Financial Institutions in Thailand: Structural Weaknesses, Support Operations, and Economic Consequences,” in Banking Crises: Cases and Issues, ed. by V. Sundararajan and Tomás J.T. Baliño (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1991), pp. 234 –75.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnston, R. Barry, and Cevla Pazarbaşioğiu. “Linkages Between Financial Variables, Financial Sector Reform, and Economic Growth and Efficiency,” IMF Working Paper, WP/95/103 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, October 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaminsky, Graciela L., and Carmen M. Reinhart, “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems,” International Finance Discussion Paper No. 544 (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kane, Edward J., “Difficulties of Transferring Risk-Based Capital Requirements to Developing Countries,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 3 (July 1995), pp. 193 –216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kapur, Ishan, and others, Ghana: Adjustment and Growth, 1983-91, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 86 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, September 1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufman, George G., “Are Some Banks Too Large to Fail? Myth and Reality,” Contemporary Policy Issues, Vol. 8 (October 1990), pp. 1 –14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufman, George G., “Bank Contagion: A Review of the Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 8 (1994), pp. 123 –50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, Myung-Sun, and William Kross, “The Impact of the 1989 Change in Bank Capital Standards on Loan Loss Provisions” (unpublished, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University, August 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kneeshaw, J. T., “Survey of Non-Financial Sector Balance Sheets in Industrialized Countries: Implications for the Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism,” BIS Working Paper No. 25 (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, April 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kupiec, Paul H., and James M. O’Brien, “A Precommitment Approach to Capital Requirements for Market Risk,” in The New Tool Set, proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, May 1995 (Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1995), pp. 552 –62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kyei, Alexander, “Deposit Protection Arrangements: A Survey,” IMF Working Paper 95/134 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, December 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lane, Timothy D., “Market Discipline,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 40 (March 1993), pp. 53 –88.

  • Leone, Alfredo M., “Institutional and Operational Aspects of Central Bank Losses,” IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment 93/14 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, September 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Louis, Jean-Victor, “Banking in the European Community After 1992,” in Vol. 2 of Current Legal Issues Affecting Central Banks, ed. by Robert C. Effros (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1994), pp. 69 –81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luckett, Dudley G., “Credit Standards and Tight Money,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 2 (November 1970), p. 420 –33.

  • Ludwig, Eugene A., letter to the Chief Executive Officers of National Banks, including a Survey of Underwriting Policies and Practices, November 7, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maciejewski, Edouard, and Ahsan Mansur, eds., Jordan—Strategy for Adjustment and Growth, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 136 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, May 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marston, David, “The Use of Reserve Requirements in Monetary Control,” IMF Monetary and Exchange Affairs Department Operational Paper (unpublished, Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mathieson, Donald J., and Richard D. Haas, “Establishing Monetary Control in Financial Systems with Insolvent Institutions,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 42 (March 1995), pp. 184 –201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishkin, Frederic S., “Asymmetric Information and Financial Crises: A Historical Perspective,” in Financial Markets and Financial Crises, ed. by Hubbard R. Glenn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 69 –108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishkin, Frederic S., “Preventing Financial Crises: An International Perspective,” NBFR Working Paper No. 4636 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montes-Negret, Fernando, and Luca Papi, “Are Bank Interest Rate Spreads Too High?” Viewpoint (Washington: The World Bank, Financial Sector Development Department, February 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nascimento, Jean-Claude, “Crisis in the Financial Sector and the Authorities’ Reaction: The Philippines,” in Banking Crises: Cases and Issues, ed. by V. Sundararajan and Tomás J. T Baliño (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1991), pp. 175 –233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Bank of Commerce, Tanzania, “Press Statement” Guardian (Dar es Salaam: July 24, 1995).

  • Otani, Ichiro, and Chi Do Pham, eds., The Lao People’s Democratic Republic—Systemic Transformation and Adjustments, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 137 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, May 1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Padoa-Schioppa, Tommaso “Cooperation Between Banking and Market Regulators,” paper presented at the XX Annual Conference of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) held in Paris, July 12, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez-Campanero, Juan, and Alfredo M. Leone, “Liberalization and Financial Crisis in Uruguay, 1974-87,” in Banking Crises: Cases and Issues, ed. by V. Sundararajan and Tomás J.T. Baliño (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1991), pp. 276 –375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perotti, Enrico C. “Bank Lending in Transition Economies,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17 (September 1993), pp. 1021 –32.

  • Perú, Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros, Guía del Director de Empresas Bancarias, Financieras y de Crédito de Consumo (Lima, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pozdena, Randall J., “Is Banking Really Prone to Panics?” Weekly Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 91-35 (October 11, 1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Premchand, A., Effective Government Accounting (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1995).

  • Prowse, Stephen, Corporate Governance in an International Perspective, BIS Economic Paper, No. 41 (Basle: Bank for International Settlements, July 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prowse, Stephen, “Alternative Methods of Corporate Control in Commercial Banks,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Third Quarter 1995), pp. 24 –36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Quirk, Peter J., and Owen Evans, Capital Account Convertibility: Review of Experience and Implications for IMF Policies, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 131 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, October 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand, “Review of Banking Supervision: Reserve Bank’s Policy Conclusions,” Reserve Bank Bulletin, Vol. 58 (June 1995), pp. 73 –78.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rojas-Suárez, Liliana, and Steven R. Weisbrod (1995a), “Banking Crises in Latin America: Experience and Issues,” paper presented at the Inter-American Development Bank Conference/Group of Thirty Conference on Banking Crises in Latin America, October 6-7, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rojas-Suárez, Liliana, and Steven R. Weisbrod, (1995b), Financial Fragilities in Latin America: The 1980s and 1990s, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 132 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, October 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romer, Christina D., and David H. Romer, “Credit Channel or Credit Actions? An Interpretation of the Postwar Transmission Mechanism,” in Changing Capital Markets: Implications for Monetary Policy, a symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August 19-21, 1993 (Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City), pp. 71 –116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosett, Claudia, “Banking Crisis Erupts in Russia Amid Rumors of Unsoundness,” Wall Street Journal, August 25, 1995, p. A4.

  • Rostowski, Jacek, “Systemic Requirements for Monetary Stability in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union,” IMF Working Paper 94/24 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, February 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saal, Matthew I., and Lorena M. Zamalloa, “Use of Central Bank Credit Auctions in Economies in Transition,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 42 (March 1995), pp. 202 –24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sandmo, Agnar, “Public Goods,” The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 3 (London and Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1987), pp. 1061 –66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saunders, Anthony (1994a), Financial Institutions Management: A Modern Perspective (Burn Ridge, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1994).

  • Saunders, Anthony (1994b), “Banking and Commerce: An Overview of the Public Policy Issues,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 18 (March 1994), pp. 231 –54.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schadler, Susan, and others, IMF Conditionally: Experience Under Stand-By and Extended Arrangements, Part I: Key Issues and Findings, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 128 (Washington: International Monetary Fund, September 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheng, Andrew, “Bank Restructuring in Malaysia, 1985-88” in Financial Regulation: Changing the Rules of the Game, ed. by Dimitri Vittas (Washington: The World Bank, 1992), pp. 195 –236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheng, Andrew, ed., Bank Restructuring—Lessons from the 1980s (Washington: The World Bank, 1996).

  • Sheng, Andrew, Tannor, Archibald A., “Ghana’s Financial Restructuring, 1983-91,” in Bank Restructuring—Lessons from the 1980s, ed. by Andrew Sheng (Washington: The World Bank, 1996), pp. 123 –32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shinagawa, Ryoichi, “Impact of Capital Requirements on the Behavior of Banks and Its Macroeconomic Implications: Japan’s Experience,” in FDICIA: An Appraisal, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, May 1993 (Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1993), pp. 156 –70.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spiegel, Mark M., “Sterilization of Capital Inflows Through the Banking Sector: Evidence from Asia,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 3 (1995), pp. 17 –34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siems, Thomas E. “Quantifying Management’s Role in Bank Survival,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (First Quarter 1992), pp. 29 –41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simons, Katerina, and Stephen Cross, “Do Capital Markets Predict Problems in Large Commercial Banks?” New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (May/June 1991), pp. 51 –56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sundararajan, V., “The Role of Prudential Supervision and Financial Restructuring of Banks During Transition to Indirect Instruments of Alonetary Control,” paper presented at the symposium on Business Finance in Emerging Markets, held at the University of Laval, Quebec, August 31-September 1, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sundararajan, V., Tomás J.T. Baliño, “Issues in Recent Banking Crises,” in Banking Crises: Cases and Issues, ed. by V. Sundararajan and Tomäs J.T. Baliño (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1991), pp. 1 –57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swiderski, Karen A., ed., Financial Programming and Policy: The Case of Hungary (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1992).

  • Thompson, C.J., The Basle Concordat: International Cooperation in Banking Supervision, in Vol. 1 of Current Legal Issues Affecting Central Bank ed. by Robert C. Effros (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1994), pp. 331 –448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomson, James B., “Modeling the Bank Regulator’s Closure Option: A Two-Step Logit Regression Approach,” Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 6 (1992). pg.5 –23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thorne, Alfredo, “Eastern Europe’s Experience with Banking Reform,” Policy Research Working Paper 1235 (Washington: World Bank, December 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Timewell, Stephen, “Latvia: The Brutal Truth,” The Banker (August 1995), pp. 35 –37.

  • Tuya, José, and Lorena Zamalloa, “Issues on Placing Banking Supervision in the Central Bank,” in Frameworks for Monetary Stability, ed. by Tomás J.T. Baliño and Carlo Cottarelli (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1994), pp. 663 –90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Kingdom, House of Commons, Report of the Board of Banking Supervision Inquiry into the Circumstances of the Collapse of Barings (London: HMSO, July 18, 1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, General Accounting Office, The Net Worth Certificate Program and the Condition of the Thrift Industry ( Washington: General Accounting Office, 1985).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, General Accounting Office, Thrift Industry: Forbearance for Troubled Institutions, 1982-1986, Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, GAO/GGD-87-78BR (Washington, May 1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, House of Representatives, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991: Report to Accompany H.R. 3768 (Washington, 1991).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, The Director’s Book (Washington, August 1987).

  • United States, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Bank Failure: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Failure of National Banks (Washington, June 1988).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, A Director’s Guide to Board Reports (Washington, 1989).

  • VanHoose, David D., “Deregulation and Oligopolistic Rivalry in Bank Deposit Markets,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 12 (September 1988), pp. 379 –88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Velasco, Andrés, “Liberalization, Crisis, Intervention: The Chilean Financial System, 1975-85,” in Banking Crises: Cases and Issues, ed. by V. Sundararajan and Tomás J.T. Baliño (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1991), pp. 113 –174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vittas, Dimitri, “The Impact of Regulation on Financial Intermediation,” in Financial Regulation: Changing the Rules of the Game, ed. by Dimitri Vittas (Washington: The World Bank, 1992), pp. 59 –84.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vos, Rob, “Financial Liberalization, Growth, and Adjustment: Some Lessons from Developing Countries,” in Financial Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. by Stephany Griffith-Jones and Zdeněk Drábek (New York: St. Martin’s Press 1995), pp. 179 –220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whalen, Gary, “A Proportional Hazards Model of Bank Failure: An Examination of Its Usefulness as an Early Warning Tool,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Vol. 27 (First Quarter 1991), pg. 21 –31.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, Michael, “Many Japanese Banks Ran Amok While Led by Former Regulators,” Wall Street Journal, January 19, 1996, pp. Al and A6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • “The World’s 100 Largest Banks,” Institutional Investor, Vol. 29 (August 1995), pp. 51 –61.