Abstract

Navigating the Pandemic: A Multispeed Recovery in Asia

Navigating the Pandemic: A Multispeed Recovery in Asia

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is still unfolding around the globe. In Asia, as elsewhere, the virus has ebbed in some countries but surged in others. The global economy is beginning to recover after a sharp contraction in the second quarter of 2020, as nationwide lockdowns are lifted and replaced with more targeted containment measures. Global growth has been revised up since the June 2020 World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update to -4.4 percent in 2020, because of better-than-expected second quarter outturns in some major countries where activity began to improve sooner than expected after lockdowns were scaled back. In 2021 global growth is projected at 5.2 percent, a little lower than projected earlier, consistent with the expectation that social distancing persists into 2021 and fades thereafter.

The Asia and Pacific region is also starting to recover tentatively, but at multiple speeds. Economic activity is expected to contract by -2.2 percent in 2020, due to a sharper-than-expected downturn in key emerging markets, and to grow by 6.9 percent in 2021—0.6 percentage point lower and 0.3 percentage point higher, respectively, than in the June 2020 World Economic Outlook Update (Figure 1.1).

Figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1.

Real GDP Growth Rates

(In percent)

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook.Note: EMDE = Emerging and Developing Economies.

The outlook varies by country depending on infection rates and containment measures, the scale and effectiveness of the policy response, reliance on contact-intensive activities, and reliance on external demand. In parts of Asia where virus transmission rates are low, mobility and activity could normalize faster than elsewhere. Scarring is likely, however, as labor market participation has fallen, and output is expected to remain below pre-pandemic trends over the medium term, with the most vulnerable in society likely to be hit the hardest.

The forecasts remain highly uncertain, with significant downside risks. A resurgence of the pandemic cannot be ruled out. Geopolitical tensions—particularly US-China—may also derail the recovery. A rise in social unrest triggered by the pandemic’s disproportionate impact on the poorest and most vulnerable could compromise recent hard-won gains, or a return to risk aversion in financial markets could add to balance sheet vulnerabilities. Prospects for an early, large-scale rollout of an effective vaccine creates an upside risk.

With the pandemic seemingly far from over, policy support should be sustained and, in some cases, increased. Strong health care and containment measures are vital until the pandemic has abated. Targeted fiscal spending is needed until the recovery is entrenched. It should aim at the most vulnerable where fiscal multipliers are highest, and to jobs-oriented, inclusive, and green investment. Looking ahead, credible fiscal plans will be key to secure debt sustainability. Monetary policy should remain supportive. Elevated credit risks demand continual monitoring, especially where debt levels are high. Policymakers need to redouble efforts to keep workers connected to the labor force and solvent firms in business while allowing nonviable firms to exit, and facilitating new businesses to emerge and generate new job opportunities, and thus mitigate scarring.

This Regional Economic Outlook draws on studies analyzing the impact of COVID-19. Chapter 3 examines the effect of containment and related policy measures on health outcomes and economic activity. Fast implementation of containment measures and appropriately timed exits—supported by strong testing and contact tracing policies—have been key in stabilizing COVID-19’s spread while mitigating its economic costs in many Asian economies. Fiscal support has also been critical to reduce economic costs, underpin recovery, and limit scarring. Chapter 4 warns that the crisis is having the largest impact on low-income workers, women, and youth, and so is increasing inequality. These distributional effects could be even larger in the medium term as robots displace low-skilled workers, and the resulting higher levels of inequality could undermine social cohesion. Policies should be targeted to mitigate the pandemic’s adverse distributional consequences and so underpin overall economic activity and virus containment.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Navigating the Pandemic: A Multispeed Recovery in Asia
  • Barro, Robert J., José F. Ursúa, and Joanna Weng. 2020. “The Coronavirus and the Great Infuenza Pandemic: Lessons from the Spanish Flu for the Coronavirus’s Potential Effects on Mortality and Economic Activity.” NBER Working Paper 26866, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bauer, A., R. Sean Craig, J. Garrido, K. Kang, K. Kashiwase, S. Kim, Y. Liu, and S. Rafq. Forthcoming. “Flattening the Insolvency Curve: Supporting the Corporate Sector in Asia and the Pacific in the Post-C19 Recovery.”

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carbonero, Francesco, Ekkehard Ernst, and Enzo Weber. 2018. “Robots Worldwide: The Impact of Automation on Employment and Trade.” ILO Research Department Working Paper 36, International Labour Organization, Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dabla-Norris, Era, and Changyong Rhee. 2020. “A ’New Deal’ for Informal Workers in Asia.” IMFBlog (blog). International Monetary Fund, April 30, 2020. https://blogs.imf.org/2020/04/30/a-new-deal-for-informal-workers-in-asia/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deb, Pragyan, Davide Furceri, Jonathan D. Ostry, and Nour Tawk. 2020a. “The Economic Effects of COVID-19 Containment Measures.” IMF Working Paper 20/158, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deb, Pragyan, Davide Furceri, Jonathan D. Ostry, and Nour Tawk. 2020b. “The Effect of Containment Measures on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” IMF Working Paper 20/159, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deb, Pragyan, Davide Furceri, Jonathan D. Ostry, Nour Tawk, and Naihan Yang. Forthcoming. “The Effect of Fiscal Policy during COVID-19: Preliminary Evidence.”

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eichenbaum, Martin S., Sergio Rebelo, and Mathias Trabandt. 2020. “The Macroeconomics of Epidemics.” NBER Working Paper 26882, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engler, P., Nathalie Pouokam, Diego Rodríguez Guzman, and Irina Yakadina. Forthcoming. “Fiscal Redistribution and Inequality in the Time of a Pandemic.”

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franks, Jeffrey, Bertrand Gruss, Carlos Mulas Granados, Manasa Patnam, and Sebastian Weber. Forthcoming. “Exiting from Lockdowns: Early Evidence from Reopenings in Europe.” IMF WorkingPaper, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furceri, Davide, Prakash Loungani, Jonathan D. Ostry, and Pietro Pizzuto. 2020. “Will COVID-19 Affect Inequality? Evidence from Past Pandemics.” COVID Economics 12 (May): 138157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graetz, Georg, and Guy Michaels. 2018. “Robots at Work.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5): 75368.

  • Haioglu, Sinem, Diego R. Känzig, and Paolo Surico. 2020. “The Distributional Impact of the Pandemic.” CEPR Discussion Paper 15101, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hale, Thomas, Sam Webster, Anna Petherick, Toby Phillips, and Beatriz Kira. 2020. University of Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker, Blavatnik School of Government. https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/researchprojects/coronavirusgovernmentresponsetracker.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, Robert E. 2005. “Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness.” American Economic Review 95 (1): 5065.

  • Hershbein, Brad, and Lisa B. Kahn. 2018. “Do Recessions Accelerate Routine-Biased Technological Change? Evidence from Vacancy Postings.” American Economic Review 108 (7): 173772.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ilzetzki, Ethan, Enrique G. Mendoza, and Carlos A. Végh. 2013. “How Big (Small?) Are Fiscal Multipliers?Journal of Monetary Economics 60 (2): 23954.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leduc, Sylvain, and Zheng Liu. 2020. “Can Pandemic-Induced Job Uncertainty Stimulate Automation?Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2020–19, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishra, Pranav Kumar, and Shekhar Mishra. 2020. “A Deductive Approach to Modeling the Spread of COVID-19.” https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.26.20044651v1.full.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mortensen, Dale T., and Christopher A. Pissarides. 1994. “Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment.” The Review of Economic Studies 61 (3): 397415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2019. Gender, Institutions, and Development Database. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GIDDB2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg, and Charalambos G. Tsangarides. 2014. “Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth.” IMF Staff Discussion Note 14/02, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodrik, Dani. 1999. “Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses.” Journal of Economic Growth 4 (December): 385412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shibata, Ippei. 2020. “The Distributional Impact of Recessions: The Global Financial Crisis and the Pandemic Recession.” IMF Working Paper No. 20/96, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. “Considerations in Adjusting Public Health and Social Measures in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance.” WHO reference number WHO/2019-nCoV/Adjusting_PH_measures/2020.1 (April 16, 2020), World Health Organization, Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation