We examine the effects of aid on growth-- in cross-sectional and panel data--after correcting for the bias that aid typically goes to poorer countries, or to countries after poor performance. Even after this correction, we find little robust evidence of a positive (or negative) relationship between aid inflows into a country and its economic growth. We also find no evidence that aid works better in better policy or geographical environments, or that certain forms of aid work better than others. Our findings, which relate to the past, do not imply that aid cannot be beneficial in the future. But they do suggest that for aid to be effective in the future, the aid apparatus will have to be rethought. Our findings raise the question: what aspects of aid offset what ought to be the indisputable growth enhancing effects of resource transfers? Thus, our findings support efforts under way at national and international levels to understand and improve aid effectiveness.
This paper provides an empirical analysis of how the frequency and severity of terrorism affect
government revenue and expenditure during the period 1970–2013 using a panel dataset on
153 countries. We find that terrorism has only a marginal negative effect on tax revenue
performance, after controlling for economic and institutional factors. This effect is also not
robust to alternative specifications and empirical strategies. On the other hand, we find strong
evidence that terrorism is associated with an increase in military spending as a percent of GDP
(and a share of total government expenditure). Our estimations reveal that this impact is
greater when terrorist attacks are frequent and result in a large number of fatalities. Empirical
findings also support the view that public finances in developing and low-income countries
are more vulnerable to terrorism than those in countries that are richer and diversified.