Browse

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • International Economics x
  • Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services; Biodiversity Conservation; Bioeconomics; Industrial Ecology x
  • Greenhouse gases x
  • Renewable Resources and Conservation: General x
  • Business and Economics x
  • Natural Resources x
  • Environment x
  • United States x
  • Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics?Environmental and Ecological Economics x
  • Sustainable Development x
  • National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General x
  • Economic & financial crises & disasters x
  • Real sector x
  • Alternative Energy Sources x
  • Financial and monetary sector x
Clear All Modify Search
Nicoletta Batini
,
Mario di Serio
,
Matteo Fragetta
, and
Mr. Giovanni Melina
This paper provides estimates of output multipliers for spending in clean energy and biodiversity conservation, as well as for spending on non-ecofriendly energy and land use activities. Using a new international dataset, we find that every dollar spent on key carbon-neutral or carbon-sink activities can generate more than a dollar’s worth of economic activity. Although not all green and non-ecofriendly expenditures in the dataset are strictly comparable due to data limitations, estimated multipliers associated with spending on renewable and fossil fuel energy investment are comparable, and the former (1.1-1.5) are larger than the latter (0.5-0.6) with over 90 percent probability. These findings survive several robustness checks and lend support to bottom-up analyses arguing that stabilizing climate and reversing biodiversity loss are not at odds with continuing economic advances.