Browse

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Greenhouse gases x
  • Bayesian Analysis: General x
  • Conservation of the environment x
  • Environment Sciences x
  • Natural resources x
  • Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth x
  • Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment x
  • Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General x
  • Financial and monetary sector x
  • Natural Resources x
  • Renewable energy sources x
  • Cross-cutting issues x
  • Renewable Resources and Conservation: General x
  • Economic sectors x
  • Environmental Economics: Generale x
  • Environmental protection x
  • Refine By Language: English x
Clear All Modify Search
Nicoletta Batini, Mario di Serio, Matteo Fragetta, and Mr. Giovanni Melina
This paper provides estimates of output multipliers for spending in clean energy and biodiversity conservation, as well as for spending on non-ecofriendly energy and land use activities. Using a new international dataset, we find that every dollar spent on key carbon-neutral or carbon-sink activities can generate more than a dollar’s worth of economic activity. Although not all green and non-ecofriendly expenditures in the dataset are strictly comparable due to data limitations, estimated multipliers associated with spending on renewable and fossil fuel energy investment are comparable, and the former (1.1-1.5) are larger than the latter (0.5-0.6) with over 90 percent probability. These findings survive several robustness checks and lend support to bottom-up analyses arguing that stabilizing climate and reversing biodiversity loss are not at odds with continuing economic advances.