Narrow Your Choices

Refine By Countries

Refine By Topic

Refine By Series

Refine By Language

  • English (2)

Refine By Date

—

Refine By IMF Taxonomy

Refine By JEL Taxonomy

Refine by LOC Taxonomy

Refine By THEMA Taxonomy

  • Print
  • Save

Browse

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Middle East and Central Asia x
  • Diseases: Contagious x
  • Finance and accounting x
  • Health, Education, and Welfare x
  • Public Economics x
  • Financial markets x
  • Cross-cutting issues x
  • Real sector x
  • Investment & securities x
  • Refine By Language: English x
Clear All Modify Search
Cover IMF Working Papers
IMF’s Precautionary Lending Instruments: Have They Worked?
Giulio Lisi
The paper documents the benefits provided by IMF’s precautionary instruments (FCL and PLL) to countries in accessing international financial markets. It builds on multiple methods to show that the announcement of new FCL or PLL generally leads to a significant decline in sovereign spreads. Next, it evaluates the role of the FCL and PLL in mitigating external financial pressures, focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. Economies which had a PLL or FCL arrangement in place during the pandemic experienced a lower increase in spreads relative to other emerging markets, even after controlling for country-specific effects and other covariates, suggesting that these arrangements help cushion external shocks. Finally, the study asks whether FCL/PLL drawdowns have an impact on financial perceptions; the analysis finds—albeit on the basis of a very small sample— no evidence of downside effects from countries drawing down on these arrangements .
Keywords:
IMF; Precautionary instruments; Event studies; Synthetic control.; PLL drawdown; precautionary lending instrument; fcl arrangement; precautionary instrument; PLL adopter; COVID-19; Emerging and frontier financial markets; Oil prices; Credit default swap; Sovereign bonds; Global
Cover Regional Economic Outlook, April 2021, Middle East and Central Asia
Regional Economic Outlook, April 2021, Middle East and Central Asia
International Monetary Fund. Middle East and Central Asia Dept.

Abstract

A year into the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the race between vaccine and virus entered a new phase in the Middle East and Central Asia, and the path to recovery in 2021 is expected to be long and divergent. The outlook will vary significantly across countries, depending on the pandemic’s path, vaccine rollouts, underlying fragilities, exposure to tourism and contact-intensive sectors, and policy space and actions. 2021 will be the year of policies that continue saving lives and livelihoods and promote recovery, while balancing the need for debt sustainability and financial resilience. At the same time, policymakers must not lose sight of the transformational challenges to build forward better and accelerate the creation of more inclusive, resilient, sustainable, and green economies. Regional and international cooperation will be key complements to strong domestic policies.

Keywords:
COVID-19; pandemic; recovery; financial crisis; public health; lockdown; social distancing; IMF staff calculation; net bank financing; financing risk; financing constraint; policy space constraint; Oil; Emerging and frontier financial markets; Government debt planning; Oil prices; Middle East and Central Asia; Global; Central Asia and the Caucasus; Middle East; North Africa