Browse

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Public finance & taxation x
  • Commercial policy x
  • Social Science x
  • 'Panel Data Models; Spatio-temporal Models' x
  • Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations x
  • Mathematical and Quantitative Methods x
  • Western Hemisphere x
  • Health, Education, and Welfare x
  • Finance and accounting x
  • Cross country analysis x
  • Business and Economics x
  • International Economics x
  • Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment x
  • Education: General x
  • Refine By Language: English x
Clear All Modify Search
Mr. Andreas Billmeier and Tommaso Nannicini
Studies of the impact of trade openness on growth are based either on cross-country analysis-which lacks transparency-or case studies-which lack statistical rigor. We apply transparent econometric methods drawn from the treatment evaluation literature to make the comparison between treated (i.e., open) and control (i.e., closed) countries explicit while remaining within a unified statistical framework. First, matching estimators highlight the rather far-fetched country comparisons underlying common cross-country results. When appropriately restricting the sample, we confirm a positive and significant effect of openness on growth. Second, we apply synthetic control methods-which account for endogeneity due to unobservable heterogeneity-to countries that liberalized their trade regime and we show that trade liberalization has often had a positive effect on growth.