You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Western Hemisphere x
  • Environmental economics x
  • Public Finance x
  • Real sector x
  • Macroeconomics x
  • China, People's Republic of x
  • Tax incentives x
  • Macroeconomics x
  • Industries; Land Use; Labor x
  • Petroleum, oil & gas industries x
  • Public finance & taxation x
  • United States x
  • Energy: General x
  • Books and Analytical Papers x
  • Finance and accounting x
  • Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies x
  • Refine By Language: English x
Clear All Modify Search
Philip Daniel, Alan Krupnick, Ms. Thornton Matheson, Mr. Peter J. Mullins, Ian W.H. Parry, and Artur Swistak
This paper suggests that the environmental and commercial features of shale gas extraction do not warrant a significantly different fiscal regime than recommended for conventional gas. Fiscal policies may have a role in addressing some environmental risks (e.g., greenhouse gases, scarce water, local air pollution) though in some cases their net benefits may be modest. Simulation analyses suggest, moreover, that special fiscal regimes are generally less important than other factors in determining shale gas investments (hence there appears little need for them), yet they forego significant revenues.