Browse

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Public Finance x
  • Finance and accounting x
  • International Economics x
  • Mathematical and Quantitative Methods x
  • Commercial policy x
  • Health, Education, and Welfare x
  • Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations x
  • Economic Theory; Demography x
  • Social Science x
  • Public finance & taxation x
  • Business and Economics x
  • Public aspects of medicine x
  • 'Panel Data Models; Spatio-temporal Models' x
  • Western Hemisphere x
  • Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment x
  • Cross country analysis x
  • Population & migration geography x
  • Refine By Language: English x
Clear All Modify Search
Mr. Andreas Billmeier and Tommaso Nannicini
Studies of the impact of trade openness on growth are based either on cross-country analysis-which lacks transparency-or case studies-which lack statistical rigor. We apply transparent econometric methods drawn from the treatment evaluation literature to make the comparison between treated (i.e., open) and control (i.e., closed) countries explicit while remaining within a unified statistical framework. First, matching estimators highlight the rather far-fetched country comparisons underlying common cross-country results. When appropriately restricting the sample, we confirm a positive and significant effect of openness on growth. Second, we apply synthetic control methods-which account for endogeneity due to unobservable heterogeneity-to countries that liberalized their trade regime and we show that trade liberalization has often had a positive effect on growth.