This section reviews the performance of LTUs in selected countries in five regions (central and eastern Europe; the Baltics and the CIS; Africa; Asia and the Pacific; and Latin America). The effectiveness of the LTUs in these countries is first assessed on the basis of a set of general indicators that reflect the main advantages and risks associated with LTUs.30 The experience of individual country LTUs in each region is then discussed, including the authorities’ own assessment of the effectiveness of their large taxpayer operations.
Australian Taxation Office, Commissioner of Taxation Annual Report, 1999–2000. Available via Internet: http://www.ato.gov.au
Bodin, Jean-Paul, 2000, “Implementing a LTU and Self-Assessment Procedures in Iran,” Fiscal Affairs Department (unpublished; Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Dos Santos, Paulo, 1994, “Administration of Large Taxpayers,” Fiscal Affairs Department (unpublished; Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Ebrill, Liam, Michael Keen, Jean-Paul Bodin, and Victoria Summers, 2001, The Modern VAT (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
New Zealand, Inland Revenue Department, Commissioner’s Annual Report 2000. Available via Internet: http://www.ird.govt.nz
United Kingdom, H.M. Inland Revenue, Annual Report of the Commissioners, 1998–2001. Available via Internet: http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk
United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, “Modernizing America’s Tax Agency,” Publication 3349 (Rev. 1–2000), Catalog Number 27171U. Available via Internet: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p3349.pdf
Vehorn, Charles L. and John Brondolo, 1999, “Organizational Options for Tax Administration,” Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation,Vol. 53 (November), pp. 499–512.
International Monetary Fund Copyright © 2010-2021. All Rights Reserved.