- Montfort Mlachila, Ahmat Jidoud, Monique Newiak, Bozena Radzewicz-Bak, and Misa Takebe
- Published Date:
- September 2016
We examine the impact of financial developments on growth, with first the composite measure and then its components, the measures of financial institutions and financial markets. Both financial institutions and markets are assessed based on their depth, access, and efficiency. Following Sahay and others (2015b), a dynamic system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator is used with additional control variables including per capita GDP, education enrollment, and share of government consumption in GDP. The share of agriculture in GDP is added to better reflect its significance in sub-Saharan Africa.
The basic estimation equation is:
where y is real GDP growth, averaged over non-overlapping five-year periods for country i at time t. The key regressors are financial development indicator (FD or its component index), its squared term, and additional interaction terms. X includes the other likely determinants described above. The model is estimated for the 1980-2013 period and all sub-Saharan African countries, but data availability varies by variable.
The quadratic form is chosen to allow for a possible non-linear impact (Arcand, Berkes, and Panizza 2012; Sahay and others 2015b). The interaction term is used to examine the impact in sub-Saharan Africa, our region of our interest. This approach also allows us to use more data from the global sample to mitigate data constraints in sub-Saharan African countries. However, given the weak coefficient on the square terms, and that most sub-Saharan African countries are at the relatively low level of financial development—and therefore below the threshold to exhibit a negative growth impact as discussed in the text—the model is run only on the level of the index in favor of parsimony.
Similarly, we estimate the financial development’s impact on economic volatility, and then extend to investment volatility and to different components of financial development. Based on the literature and the specific context of sub-Saharan Africa, additional control variables include: five-year lags of GDP per capita, trade and financial openness, energy exports (percent of GDP), volatility of foreign growth, gross capital inflows in the region excluding country in question, terms-of-trade changes, polity index, growth in GDP per capita, government consumption, and aid to GDP volatility for 1995–2013.
The large size of the coefficients of the financial development variables on investment volatility could be explained by the substantial volatility of investment across countries and over time. In addition, although the coefficient is positive for the global sample, the financial development coefficient for sub-Saharan African countries (FD + FD * SSA) is statistically significant and negative while the coefficient on the square term is statistically significant and positive. Similar results were obtained using a two-stage least square estimator.
|Financial development index|
|Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Financial institutions index||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Financial markets index||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Real GDP growth||IMF WEO database|
|Growth volatility||Authors’ calculation. Five-year rolling standard deviation of real GDP growth|
|Investment volatility||Authors’ calculation. Five-year rolling standard deviation of growth of investment-to-GDP ratio|
|GDP per capita||IMF WEO database|
|Education enrollment, primary||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Share of government consumption in GDP||Penn World Tables, version 7|
|Agriculture value added (percent of GDP)||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Investment-to-GDP ratio||IMF, World Economic Outlook database|
|Trade openness||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Financial openness||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Energy exports (percent of GDP)||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Volatility of foreign growth weighted by export||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Volatility of regional gross inflow/GDP ratios-winsorized (5 percentile, 95 percentile)||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Volatility of term of trade changes||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Real aid to GDP growth||IMF (2015b)|
|Institutional quality||Polity IV database, Marshall and others (2010)|
This annex examines the drivers of financial development using the generalized method of moments (GMM) to mitigate endogeneity problems. The model used panel regressions of data for 1980-2013 for about 90 developing countries (excluding oil exporters), although the number of observations varies depending on the variables.
The estimation equation is:
where FD is the financial development index for country i at time t. CA stands for de facto capital account openness, TO for de facto trade openness (ratio of the sum of imports and exports to GDP), GDP for real GDP per capita, I for inflation, CR for country risk rating, and SSA for a sub-Sahara Africa dummy variable, and ε is the error term.
All the coefficients of the main variables show expected signs. Interaction terms with the sub-Saharan Africa dummy variable should be interpreted as the incremental impact for the regions’ countries (Table 3 in the main text). The overall impact for the region’s countries should be evaluated by the sum of the coefficients for all developing countries and the coefficients on interaction terms. For example, the overall impact of capital account openness of the region’s countries should become 0.014 (= 0.005 + 0.009). A robustness test was conducted including oil exporters, but the main results were not changed.
The second section examines the impediments of financial development focusing on institutional quality. The purpose is to investigate why some countries’ financial development is less advanced than others’ compared to the benchmark. A simple ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was run with each country’s financial development distance to its benchmark. The distance to the benchmark is the average in the period of 2011 and 2013 and institutional quality is as of 2013. The results should be interpreted in such a way that institutional quality with a higher coefficient is more influential to the distance to the benchmark (Table 4 in the main text). Of the 21 institutional quality indices, 14 have an expected sign while the remaining 7 indices do not but these were statistically insignificant. Robustness tests were conducted with various institutional quality indicators such as the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), the World Bank’s Doing Business Indicators, and institutional indicators of Polity IV. The results are qualitatively similar.
|Financial development index||See Box 1.||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Capital account openness||Sum of international assets and liabilities as a share of GDP, indicating the country’s de facto degree of capital account openness||IMF WEO database|
|Trade openness index||Sum of exports and imports of goods and services as a share of GDP||IMF WEO database|
|Real GDP per capita||…||IMF WEO database|
|Inflation||Annual inflation rate||IMF WEO database|
|ICRG country risk rating||International Country Risk Guide country risk rating, which covers political, financial, and economic risks||PRS Group|
|SSA (dummy)||A dummy variable with value 1 for sub-Saharan African countries, as defined by the IMF||IMF WEO database|
|Financial development index’s distance to the benchmark||Derived from the results in chapter 1||IMF|
|Institutional quality index||The index consists of 21 categories and is constructed mainly based on the WEF’s Executive Opinion Survey, which captures the opinions of over 14,000 business leaders in 144 economies||Global Competitiveness Index Pillar 1 (Institution) by the World Economic Forum (WEF)|
This Annex provides an overview of the data sources used in the empirical analysis of the drivers of income inequality in Chapter 4.
|Income Inequality||The traditional Gini measure of inequality. In this paper, we use “net” Gini but find similar results with “market” Gini. This is the dependent variable in the analysis on the gender determinants of income inequality. A value of 0 represents perfect equality.||Solt (2014).|
|Labor Force Participation||The ratio of labor force participation rate of females to males. A value of 1 represents perfect equality.||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Financial inclusion gap||The result of a principal components analysis (PCA) estimate on five Findex time series variables if an individual: (1) has an account at a financial institution, (2) has a credit card, (3) has a debit card, (4) saved at a financial institution, and (5) borrowed from a financial institution. Each variable is disaggregated by gender. We first calculated ratios of female to male inclusion for each component before performing PCA on these ratios; the final variable is the fitted value using the principal component. A value of 1 represents perfect equality.||World Bank (2014b), Global Findex 2014|
|GDP per capita||The logged GDP per capita (in constant 2011 international dollars).||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Financial development||This is an index published by the IMF in a Staff Discussion Note (SDN) that aims to measure financial development. The index takes on values in the continuum between 0 and 1, where 1 represents maximum development. Please refer to the SDN for details on the methodology.||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Financial development * advanced economies||An interaction term of financial development with a dummy variable that takes on value 1 for advanced economies (as per IMF definition)||Sahay and others (2015b)|
|Agriculture share of GDP||The value-added share of agriculture as a percentage of GDP||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Government consumption expenditure||Government consumption expenditure as a percentage of GDP||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|GDP per capita squared||The squared value of the GDP per capita variable||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|Education gap||The difference between the mean years of schooling for females and males across all educational attainment levels. A positive value represents more female schooling. The source data is the UN HDR 2013.||Barro and Lee (2013), UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2013), and Human Development Report Office estimates based on data on educational attainment from UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2013) and on methodology from Barro and Lee (2013)|
|Marriage age differential||From the UN World Marriage Database, we extract the Singulate Mean Age at Marriage (SMAM), which is the average length of single life expressed in years among those who marry before age 50. We take the difference of this between male and female SMAM, such that a positive value is how much (on average) older the male spouse is compared to the female.||United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Marriage Data 2012|
|Equal rights to get a job (dummy)||This is a dummy variable that takes on value 1 when the answer to the WBL question “Can a married woman get a job or pursue a trade or profession in the same way as a married man?” is “Yes.”||World Bank (2013)|
|Female legal rights index||The sum of 10 binary indicators representing existence of selected (unmarried and married) women’s legal rights. Takes on value of 0 (no rights) to 10 (all selected rights). Rights include obtaining identification, signing contracts, inheritance, ownership of property, and favorability of the default marital regime.||World Bank (2013), and IMF (2015b).|
|Fertility rate||The number of children that would be born to a woman if she were to live to the end of her childbearing years and bear children in accordance with age-specific fertility rates of the specified year||World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators|
|SSA (dummy)||A dummy variable with value 1 for sub-Saharan African countries, as defined by the IMF||IMF classification|
|SSA * Financial inclusion gap||An interaction term of the Financial inclusion gap with the SSA dummy variable||IMF classification|
1997. “Was Prometheus Unbound by Chance? Risk, Diversification and Growth.” Journal of Political Economy105 (4): 509–71.
2005. “Unbundling Institutions.” Journal of Political Economy113 (5): 949–95.
2004 “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth.” NBER Working Paper 10481. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
2015. “Financial Inclusion and Development in the CEMAC.” IMF Working Paper 15/235, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2009. “Institutional Factors and Financial Sector Development: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.” IMF Working Paper 09/258, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2012. “Too Much Finance?” IMF Working Paper 12/161, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2012. “Commodity Windfalls, Democracy, and External Debt.” Economic Journal Royal Economic Society122 (561): 848–66.
2013. “Boom-bust Cycle, Asymmetrical Fiscal Response and the Dutch Disease.” Journal of Development Economics101: 256–67.
Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2010. “Microfinance Activities and the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.” Consultative Document, Bank of International Settlements, Basel.
2013. “Too Cold, Too Hot, or Just Right? Assessing Financial Sector Development across the Globe.” IMF Working Paper 13/81, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2013. “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010.” Journal of Development Economics, vol 104, pp.184–198.
2008. “The Econometrics of Finance and Growth.” Policy Research Working Paper 4608, World Bank, Washington.
2013. “Financial Sector Development in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges.” World Bank, Washington.
1999. In Taylor and Woodford, Eds. Handbook of Macroeconomics, Volume 1. North-Holland: Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York.
2009. “Fertility, Female Labor Force Participation, and the Demographic Dividend.” Journal of Economic Growth14 (2): 79–101.
2001. “The Impact of Inflation on Financial Sector Performance.” Journal of Monetary Economics47: 221–48.
2010. “International Commodity Prices, Growth and the Outbreak of Civil War in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Economic Journal120 (544): 519–34.
2001. “International and Domestic Collateral Constraints in a Model of Emerging Markets Crisis.” Journal of Monetary Economics48 (3): 513–48.
2015. “Why Does Financial Sector Growth Crowd out Real Economic Growth?” BIS Working Paper 490. Bank for International Settlement, Basel.
Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP). 2015. “Women and Financial Inclusion.” http://www.cgap.org/topics/women-and-financial-inclusion.
CGAP and Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX), 2011, MIX Microfinance World: Sub-Saharan Africa Microfinance Analysis and Benchmarking Report 2010.
2010. “A Framework for Financial Market Development.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform13 (2): 107–35.
2005. “What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions.” NBER Working Paper 11370. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Aggregate Costs of Gender Gaps in the Labor Market: A Quantitative Estimate.” Journal of Human Capital.“
2016. “Benin: Selected Issues.” IMF Country Report 16/7, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2015. “Identifying Constraints to Financial Inclusion and Their Impact on GDP and Inequality.” IMF Working Paper 15/22, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2015. “Does International Integration Matter for Financial Development in Africa?” Applied Economics47 (15): 1525–49.
1995. “International Commodity Prices, Macroeconomic Performance, and Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Studies in International Finance 79, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
2000. “Commodity Price Uncertainty and Shocks: Implications for Economic Growth.” Centre for the Study of African Economics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gender Gaps in Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality.” In Women, Work and Economic Growth—Leveling the Playing Field.Washington: International Monetary Fund.“
2013. “Islamic Finance and Financial Inclusion Measuring Use of and Demand for Formal Financial Services among Muslim Adults.” Policy Research Working Paper 6642, World Bank, Washington.
2015. “The Global Findex Database 2014: Measuring Financial Inclusion around the World.” Policy Research Working Paper 7225, World Bank, Washington.
2005. “Private Credit in 129 Countries.” NBER Working Paper 11078. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
2012. “Women Empowerment and Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Literature50 (4): 1051–79.
2011. “Dynamic Female Labor Supply.” Econometrica79 (6): 1675–726.
2015. “Pan-African Banking. Opportunities and Challenges for Cross-Border Banking.” African Department Paper 15/3, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1993. “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics.” Review of Economic Studies60 (1): 35–52.
2014. “Islamic Finance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status and Prospects.” IMF Working Paper 14/149, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2015. “Fair Play: More Equal Laws Boost Female Labor Force Participation.” IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/02, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1969. Financial Structure and Development.New Haven, Yale University Press.
1996. “Financial Markets in Development, and the Development of Financial Markets.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control21, 145–81.
1980. “Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation.” Bell Journal of Economics11, 42–64.
Groupe Speciale Mobile Association (GSMA). 2015. “The Mobile Economy: Sub-Saharan Africa 2015.” GSMA, London.
2006. “Sub-Saharan Africa: Financial Sector Challenges.” International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1967. “Financial Structure and Economic Development.” Economic Development and Cultural Change15 (3): 257–268.
2002. “Microfinance Institutions and Public Policy.” IMF Working Paper 02/159, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2008. “Cross-Country Variation in Household Access to Financial Services.” Journal of Banking and Finance32: 2493–2500.
2015 “Is Islamic Banking Good for Growth.” IMF Working Paper 15/81, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2007. “Namibia: Financial System Stability Assessment, Including Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes on Banking Supervision.” IMF Country Report 07/83, Washington, February.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2012a. “Enhancing Financial Sector Surveillance in Low Income Countries: Financial Deepening and Macro-Stability.” IMF Policy Paper, Washington, April.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2012b. “Enhancing Financial Sector Surveillance in Low Income Countries (LICs)—Case Studies.” IMF Policy Paper, Washington, April.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2013. “West African Economic and Monetary Union(WAEMU): Common Policies of Member Countries Staff Report.” IMF Country Report 13/92, International Monetary Fund, Washington, April.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015a. “Advancing Financial Development in Latin America and the Caribbean.” In Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere, Chapter 5. Washington, October.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015b. “Inequality and Economic Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Regional Economic Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa, Chapter 3. Washington, October.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015c. “Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC): Common Policies of Member Countries Staff Report.” IMF Country Report 15/222, Washington, August.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015d. “Malawi: Staff Report for the 2015 Article IV Consultation.” IMF Country Report 15/345, Washington, December.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015e. “Namibia: Staff Report for the 2015 Article IV Consultation.” IMF Country Report 15/276, Washington, September.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015f. “Uganda: Staff Report for the 2015 Article IV Consultation and Fourth Review under the Policy Support Instrument.” IMF Country Report 15/175, Washington, June.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2015g. “West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU): Staff Report on Common Policies of Member Countries.” IMF Country Report 15/100, Washington, March.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2016a. “Time for a Policy Reset.” In Regional Economic Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa, Chapter 1. Washington, April.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2016b. “West African Economic and Monetary Union(WAEMU): Staff Report on Common Policies of Member Countries” IMF Country Report 16/96, International Monetary Fund, Washington, March.
2011. “Mobile Money: The Economics of M-PESA.” NBER Working Paper 16721. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, January2011.
2014. “Oversight Issues in Mobile Payments.” IMF Working Paper 14/123, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
IMF Staff Team. 2015. “Islamic Finance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Options.” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/15/05, International Monetary Fund, Washington.an
2016. “Commodity Price Shocks and Financial Sector Fragility.” IMF Working Paper 16/12, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1993. “Finance, Entrepreneurship, and Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Monetary Economics32, 513–42.
2008. “Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Depth, and Economic Growth.” Journal of International Money and Finance27 (6): 861–75.
2011. “Mobile Banking and Financial Inclusion: The Regulatory Lessons.” Policy Research Working Paper 5664, World Bank, Washington.
2012. “Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update.” IMF Working Paper 12/163, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1997. “Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda.” Journal of Economic Literature35, 688–726.
2005. “Finance and Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by P.Aghion and S.Durlauf. (ed)Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2015. “Namibia: Macro-Financial Risks Associated with Housing Boom—Selected Issues.” IMF Country Report 15/277, International Monetary Fund, Washington. October.
2010. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. University of Maryland. www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm.
2011. “Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya.” NBER Working Paper 17129, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
2015. “Banking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Key Features and Challenges.” IMF African Departmental Paper 15/08, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2013. “Banking in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Macroeconomic Context.” IMF African Departmental Paper 13/03, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2010. “Female Labor Force Participation and Total Fertility Rates in the OECD: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Granger Causality Testing.” Journal of Economics and Business62 (1): 48–64.
2015. “West African Economic and Monetary Union, IMF Selected Issues Paper: Financial Inclusion in the WAEMU.” IMF Country Report 15/101, International Monetary Fund, Washington, April.
1994. “Risk-Taking, Global Diversification, and Growth.” American Economic Review84, 1310–29.
2014. “Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth.” IMF Staff Discussion Note 14/02, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1998. “Financial Dependence and Growth.” American Economic Review88, 559–86.
2003. “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Financial Economics69 (1): 5–50.
2014. Microfinance Market Outlook 2015.November. http://www.responsability.com/funding/data/docs/es/10427/Microfinance-Market-Outlook-2015-DE.pdf.
2012. “Due Diligence: An Impertinent Inquiry into Microfinance.” Center for Global Development, Washington, January. http://www.cgdev.org/event/due-diligence-impertinent-inquiry-microfinance.
2015a. “Financial Inclusion: Can It Meet Multiple Macroeconomic Goals?” IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/17, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2015b. “Rethinking Financial Deepening: Stability and Growth in Emerging Markets.” IMF Staff Discussion Note 15/08, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance52, 737–83.
2009. “Financial Deepening in the CFA Franc Zone: The Role of Institutions.” IMF Working Paper 09/113, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2014. “The Standardized World Income Inequality Database.” Working Paper. SWIID 5.0. October.
2012. “Can Women Save Japan?” IMF Working Paper 12/248, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2015. “Recent Trends in Banking in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Financing to Investment.” European Investment Bank, Luxembourg, July.
2002. “Markets for Risk and Openness to Trade: How Are They Related?” Journal of International Economics57 (2): 369–95.
2016. “Introducing a New Broad-Based Indicator of Financial Development.” IMF Working Paper 16/05, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
2008. “Do Financial Sector Reforms Lead to Financial Development? Evidence from a New Dataset,” IMF Working Paper 08/265, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
World Bank. 2012. Global Financial Development Report 2013: Rethinking the Role of Government in Finance.Washington.
World Bank. 2013. Women, Business and the Law 2014. Removing Restrictions to Enhance Gender Equality. World Bank, Washington.
World Bank. 2014a. Global Financial Development Report: Financial Inclusion.World Bank, Washington.
World Bank, 2015b. Global Financial Inclusion Index (Findex).World Bank, Washington.
World Bank, and International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2008. “Financial Sector Assessment. Botswana.” Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), Washington, August.
Dependent variable: overall index of financial development and index of financial institutions (see Box 1). The explanatory variables include: log of real GDP per capita and its square term to account for non-linearities, population, population density, the age-dependency ratio to account for different savings behaviors across income groups, dummies for oil exporters and legal origin, and time dummies to capture the global macroeconomic environment. IMF (2015b) follows a similar approach with a different financial development index. Barajas and others (2013) used similarly structured regression to benchmark countries’ private sector credit-to-GDP ratios against a statistical benchmark, which has been applied to specific country groups in various cases (for example, Alter and Yontcheva 2015;Newiak and Awad 2015). Similar results were obtained when examining financial institutions and financial markets separately.
Evidence from Arcand, Berkes, and Panizza (2012) shows an adverse impact of finance on growth above a private credit-to-GDP threshold of 100 percent, far above the actual level of sub-Saharan African countries.
As identified in the literature on finance and growth (for example, Levine 2005 and Beck 2008), the empirical analysis faces significant endogeneity issues. Following the literature, our analysis uses the panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator that uses lagged variables as instruments to minimize the problem.
See Annex 1 for details on data and the econometric specification.
We report only the results for our most parsimonious model, as the results show that the parameter on the square term of financial development is not significant.
To obtain the growth impact from increasing the baseline financial development level to a higher one—while holding other conditions equal—we calculate a new growth rate by using the new index and coefficients in Table 1, while the baseline growth rate is calculated using the existing index. Thus the difference between the two growth rates can be considered as a one-off impact owing to the improvement of the financial development index. The estimates for country groups are based on a median index for the corresponding group.
Government debt has increased from 18 percent to 22 percent of banks’ total assets between 2011 and 2014 in the WAMEU region.
See Annex 2 for details on data and econometric specification.
The GMM estimation method was employed to mitigate the problems caused by variables’ endogeneity. Nevertheless, the lack of consensus on the theory of the factors driving financial development suggests some uncertainty in model specification, and thus the results from this exploratory analysis should be interpreted with due caution.
While there are many other candidates for a proxy for macroeconomic stability, inflation is the most widely used measure of macroeconomic stability.
The institutional quality index was obtained from the Global Competitiveness Index’s Pillar 1 (Institution) by the World Economic Forum. Using alternative indicators, such as the World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessment index of the World Bank’s Doing Business indicators, yields similar results.
The same exercise was conducted with the World Bank’s Doing Business indicators, and the institutional indices of Polity IV. The results are similar but less robust than those from the Global Competitiveness Index.
Refer to Kammer and others (2005) for a comprehensive description of Islamic finance products.
Senegal and Côte d’Ivoire have recently issued Sukuks of US$164 million and US$246 million, respectively, to finance infrastructure projects, while South Africa issued US$500 million with the aim to become the Islamic finance hub for sub-Saharan Africa’s infrastructure financing.
M-Shwari and M-Kesho are banking platforms that enable customers to save, earn interest and access small amounts of credit via mobile phone. M-Kopa—originally set up as a company that sold small solar panels to rural population for which it allowed customers to make daily micro-payments—overtime became a provider of mobile money services.
This section is based on Deléchat, Newiak, and Yang (forthcoming).
We construct an index of formal financial inclusion using data from the World Bank (2014b) Global Findex database, using a principal components analysis approach. The index covers the following dimensions, defined as ratio of female to male, as a share of the total population ages 15 and older: having a bank account at a formal financial institution, having a debit card, having a credit card, saving in a formal financial institution, and borrowing from a formal financial institution.
This section is based on Kinda, Mlachila, and Ouedraogo (2016).
Countries included in the sample are net exporters of a nonrenewable commodity, where that commodity represents at least 10 percent of the country’s total exports in 2005, the base year, and for which sufficient financial sector data are available. Sub-Saharan countries are Angola, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
The mean comparison T-test shows that the differences are statistically significant for NPLs, provisions to NPLs, return on equity, and banking crises.