Front Matter

Front Matter

Author(s):
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
Published Date:
April 2010
    Share
    • ShareShare
    Show Summary Details

    © 2010 International Monetary Fund

    Cataloging-in-Publication Data

    Regional economic outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa: Back to High Growth? – Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2010.

    • p. ; cm. – (World economic and financial surveys, 0258-7440)

    Includes bibliographical references.

    ISBN 978-1-58906-918-3

    1. Economic forecasting – Africa, Sub-Saharan. 2. Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009.

    3. Economic development – Africa, Sub-Saharan. 4. Fiscal policy – Africa, Sub-Saharan.

    I. International Monetary Fund. II. Series: World economic and financial surveys.

    HC800 .R445 2010

    Please send orders to:

    International Monetary Fund, Publication Services

    PO Box 92780, Washington, DC 20090, U.S.A.

    Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201

    E-mail: publications@imf.org

    Internet: http://www.imfbookstore.org

    Contents

    Abbreviations

    CEMAC

    Central African Economic and Monetary Union

    CFA

    Currency zone of CEMAC and WAEMU

    CPI

    Consumer price index

    DAC

    Development Assistance Committee

    EMP

    Exchange market pressure

    FDI

    Foreign direct investment

    GCC

    Gulf Cooperation Council

    GDP

    Gross domestic product

    HIPC

    Heavily indebted poor countries

    ICRG

    International Country risk Guide

    LIC

    Low-income countries

    MDG

    Millennium Development Goal

    MDRI

    Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative

    MIC

    Middle-income countries

    MTFF

    Medium term fiscal frameworks

    NACSA

    National Commission for Social Action

    ODA

    Official development assistance

    ODI

    Overseas Development Institute

    OECD

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

    PFM

    Public Financial Management

    REO

    Regional Economic Outlook

    RI

    Resistance Index

    SDR

    Special Drawing Rights

    SSA

    Sub-Saharan Africa

    WAEMU

    West African Economic and Monetary Union

    WEO

    World Economic Outlook

    The following conventions are used in this publication:

    • In tables, a blank cell indicates “not applicable,” ellipsis points (…) indicate “not available,” and 0 or 0.0 indicates “zero” or “negligible.” Minor discrepancies between sums of constituent figures and totals are due to rounding.

    • An en-dash (–) between years or months (for example, 2009–10 or January–June) indicates the years or months covered, including the beginning and ending years or months; a slash or virgule (/) between years or months (for example, 2005/06) indicates a fiscal or financial year, as does the abbreviation FY (for example, FY2006).

    • “Billion” means a thousand million; “trillion” means a thousand billion.

    • “Basis points” refer to hundredths of 1 percentage point (for example, 25 basis points are equivalent to ¼ of 1 percentage point).

    Preface

    This April 2010 issue of the Regional Economic Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa (REO) was prepared by a team led by Abebe Aemro Selassie, Robert Burgess, and Montfort Mlachila under the direction of Saul Lizondo. The team included Duval Guimarães, Robert Keyfitz, Victor Lledó, Yanliang Miao, Gustavo Ramirez, Jon Shields, and Irene Yackovlev. Specific contributions were made by Jiro Honda, Alexei Kireyev, Amina Lahreche, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, Genevieve Verdier, and Charles Amo Yartey; with editorial assistance from Anne Grant. Production was by Natasha Minges assisted by Anne O’Donoghue, and the editing and production was overseen by Joanne Blake of the External Relations Department assisted by Martha Bonilla.

    Main Findings

    The economic slowdown in sub-Saharan Africa looks set to be mercifu ly brief:

    • Output is projected to expand by 4¾ percent in 2010, compared to 2 percent in 2009. Most countries in the region are now bouncing back from the growth slowdown or contraction in output experienced during the global recession. The brevity of the slowdown owes much to the relative strength of the region’s economies heading into 2008–09, the expansionary macroeconomic stance then adopted by most countries, and the relatively quick recovery in global economic activity.

    • Althoug h most low-income countries experienced only a smal decline in growth, the slowdown has imposed some lasting costs on the region. Progress in poverty reduction has been held up. Some of the region’s oil exporters and middle-income countries have faced large adjustments, including sharply rising unemployment.

    • The prospects for 2011 and beyond look good. Output growth is projected to accelerate to 5¾ percent in 2011, playing off the expected continued improvement in global economic conditions. Over the medium term, growth rates in most sub-Saharan African countries are expected to be only marginally below those enjoyed in the mid-2000s.

    • The main risks to the outlook are a possible hiatus in the global recovery (causing demand and commodity prices to slip) and, internally, political instability or a deterioration in financial systems in some countries.

    Perhaps one of the least noticed aspects of the global downturn has been the resilience of the sub-Saharan Africa region. The limited integration of many countries in the region into the global economy may have helped, but only marginally. Previous (milder) global economic slowdowns had a much more damaging impact. This time, the global downturn was much sharper, but the dislocation was far less. The main factor distinguishing this slowdown from previous cycles has been the stronger macroeconomic position of most countries in the region.

    As the g lobal financial crisis started to unfold, economic policies were directed quickly and e fectively toward ameliorating the impact of the external shocks. Most governments that anticipated the slowdown made plans to accelerate public spending growth, despite stagnant or declining ratios of revenue to GDP. The rise in their fiscal deficits helped to offset faltering private spending. On the monetary policy side, policy interest rates were also reduced except where this would have been counterproductive because of exchange rate considerations or inflationary pressures.

    Moreover, most countries were able to shield pro-poor and pro-g rowth public spending. According to preliminary budget outturn numbers, health, and education spending increased in real terms in 20 of the 29 low-income countries in the region in 2009. In a similar vein, government capital spending also looks to have held up in 2009, increasing in real terms in more than half of the countries in the region.

    External financing proved to be much less of a constraint than feared. The boom-bust cycle in private financial inflows was less marked than in other regions, largely due to the high share in sub-Saharan Africa of foreign direct investment over other more volatile forms of private capital. Remittances also fell only slightly and official financing flows have increased in response to efforts by the IMF and other agencies to scale up support in response to the crisis. Foreign investors are already beginning to return to the region’s more advanced economies, where macroeconomic policies will need to take into account these renewed flows to avoid overheating, unwarranted exchange rate appreciation, and asset price booms.

    More than a third of countries in the region, however, remain on the margins of international capital markets and dependent on o ficial forms of external financing. For these countries, the same reforms that are needed to raise productive potential—including promoting trade and financial sector development, encouraging domestic saving and investment, raising standards of governance, and strengthening institutions—are also likely to help attract private inflows on a sustained basis.

    Looking ahead, for most countries in the region, the emphasis of economic policies now needs to be on medium-term development objectives consistent with macroeconomic stability considera tions. With recovery under way, fiscal policies in these countries needs to shift from near-term and output stabilization considerations toward a more traditional focus on strengthening health and education systems and addressing infrastructure gaps. Where fiscal deficits have been increased beyond sustainable medium-term paths, these should be revisited so that policy buffers can be restored. Of course, in some countries where output remains well below potential, there remains a strong case for fiscal policy to help sustain demand in the near term, subject to financing availability.

      You are not logged in and do not have access to this content. Please login or, to subscribe to IMF eLibrary, please click here

      Other Resources Citing This Publication