Front Matter

Author(s):
International Monetary Fund. Asia and Pacific Dept
Published Date:
May 2010
    Share
    • ShareShare
    Show Summary Details

    ©2010 International Monetary Fund

    Cataloging-in-Publications Data

    Regional economic outlook: Asia and Pacific: leading the global recovery: rebalancing for the medium term. – Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2010. p.; cm. – (World economic and financial surveys, 0258-7440)

    Includes bibliographical references.

    ISBN 978-1-58906-917-6

    1. Economic forecasting – Asia. 2. Economic forecasting – Pacific Area. 3. Economic development – Asia. 4. Economic development – Pacific Area. 5. Capital movements – Asia. 6. Capital movements – Pacific Area. I. International Monetary Fund. II. Series: World economic and financial surveys.

    HC412.R445 2010

    Please send orders to:

    International Monetary Fund, Publication Services

    PO Box 92780, Washington, DC 20090, U.S.A.

    Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201

    E-mail: publications@imf.org

    Internet: www.imfbookstore.org

    Contents

    Definitions

    In this Regional Economic Outlook: Asia and Pacific, the following groupings are employed:

    • “Emerging Asia” refers to China, Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan Province of China, Thailand, and Vietnam.

    • “Industrial Asia” refers to Australia, Japan, and New Zealand.

    • “Asia” refers to emerging Asia plus industrial Asia.

    • “Newly industrialized economies” (NIEs) refers to Hong Kong SAR, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan Province of China.

    • “ASEAN-4” refers to Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand

    • “ASEAN-5” refers to Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.

    • “EU-15” refers to Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

    • “G-2” refers to the euro area and the United States.

    • “G-7” refers to Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    • “G-20” refers to Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    • “TED Spreads” refers to the difference between the interest rates on interbank loans and short-term government debt.

    The following abbreviations are used:

    AsDB

    Asian Development Bank

    ASEAN

    Association of Southeast Asian Nations

    BoJ

    Bank of Japan

    CGER

    Consultative Group on Exchange Rates

    CIS

    Commonwealth of Independent States

    CPI

    consumer price index

    DEA

    domestically oriented Asia

    EEA

    export-dependent emerging Asia

    EM

    emerging markets

    ERM

    exchange rate mechanism

    FCL

    Flexible Credit Line

    FDI

    foreign direct investment

    GDP

    gross domestic product

    GIMF model

    Global Integrated Monetary and Fiscal model

    GMM

    generalized method of moments

    IPO

    initial public offering

    ISIC

    International Standard Industrial Classification

    IT

    information technology

    LIC

    low-income countries

    NIE

    newly industrialized economy

    NPL

    nonperforming loan

    OECD

    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

    P/E

    price-earnings

    PICs

    Pacific Island countries

    PMI

    purchasing managers index

    PPP

    purchasing power parity

    REER

    real effective exchange rate

    REO

    Regional Economic Outlook

    RoW

    rest of the world

    SAAR

    seasonally adjusted at an annual rate

    SDR

    Special Drawing Right

    SITC

    Standard International Trade Classification

    SMEs

    small and medium-sized enterprises

    SOE

    state-owned enterprises

    UN

    United Nations

    WEO

    World Economic Outlook

    The following conventions are used:

    • In tables, a blank cell indicates “not applicable,” ellipsis points ( . . . ) indicate “not available,” and 0 or 0.0 indicates “zero” or “negligible.” Minor discrepancies between sums of constituent figures and totals are due to rounding.

    • An en dash (–) between years or months (for example, 2007–08 or January–June) indicates the years or months covered, including the beginning and ending years or months; a slash or virgule (/) between years or months (for example, 2007/08) indicates a fiscal or financial year, as does the abbreviation FY (for example, FY2009).

    • An em dash (—) indicates the figure is zero or less than half the final digit shown.

    • “Billion” means a thousand million; “trillion” means a thousand billion.

    • “Basis points” refer to hundredths of 1 percentage point (for example, 25 basis points are equivalent to ¼ of 1 percentage point).

    As used in this report, the term “country” does not in all cases refer to a territorial entity that is a state as understood by international law and practice. As used here, the term also covers some territorial entities that are not states but for which statistical data are maintained on a separate and independent basis.

    This Regional Economic Outlook: Asia and Pacific was prepared by a team coordinated by Roberto Cardarelli of the IMF’s Asia and Pacific Department, under the overall direction of Anoop Singh, Kalpana Kochhar, and Mahmood Pradhan. The team included Ashvin Ahuja, Emre Alper, Vivek Arora, Steven Barnett, Nigel Chalk, Marcos Chamon, Pelin Berkmen, Ran Bi, Varapat Chensavasdijai, Rodrigo Cubero, Jonathan Dunn, Leif Lybecker Eskesen, Tarhan Feyzioglu, Sonali Jain-Chandra, Kenneth Kang, Malhar Nabar, Shanaka Peiris, Papa N’Diaye, Runchana Pongsaparn, Romauld Semblat, Chad Steinberg, Murtaza Syed, D. Filiz Unsal, and Olaf Unteroberdoerster. To-Nhu Dao, Souvik Gupta, Adil Mohommad, and Yiqun Wu provided research assistance; Lesa Yee and Imel Yu provided production assistance. Joanne Blake and Julia Lutz of the IMF’s External Relations Department edited the volume and coordinated its publication and release. This report includes comments from other departments and some Executive Directors.

    Executive Summary

    One year after the deepest recession in recent history, Asia is leading the global recovery. The pace of the recovery in advanced economies has been held back by high unemployment rates, weak household balance sheets, and anemic bank credit, and it remains heavily dependent on macroeconomic policy support. By contrast, activity in many emerging and developing markets has continued to rebound swiftly over the course of 2009 and in the first quarter of 2010, particularly in Asia. The pattern of economic recovery has varied within Asia, with the more domestically oriented economies (China, India, and Indonesia) and Australia escaping a recession, and the more export-oriented economies experiencing a sharply V-shaped business cycle. By the end of 2009, output in most of Asia had returned to pre-crisis levels, even in those economies hit hardest by the crisis.

    Asia’s faster recovery relative to the rest of the world seems to mark a break from the past. Although Asia’s GDP trend growth has exceeded that of advanced economies over the last three decades, this is the first time that Asia’s contribution to a global recovery has outstripped that of other regions. Furthermore, while in past recessions Asia’s recovery generally was driven by exports, this time it has also been reinforced by resilient domestic demand, particularly household consumption. Finally, while in past recoveries capital was slow to return to Asia, this time net capital inflows to the region have surged, a reflection of extremely high levels of global liquidity but also a testament to Asia’s improved resilience and economic framework.

    As discussed in Chapters I and II, over the near term, Asia is expected to continue leading the global recovery, for two main reasons. First, the global and domestic inventory cycle is likely to boost Asia’s industrial production and exports further for most of 2010 as demand finally recovers in advanced economies. Second, although macroeconomic policies may become less accommodative, private domestic demand is expected to remain robust. With the recovery of economic activity becoming more entrenched, many governments are now planning a gradual withdrawal of both fiscal and monetary policy stimulus. In many regional economies, however, private domestic demand appears to have sufficient momentum to sustain near-term growth, as high asset values, strong consumer confidence, and a gradual improvement in employment conditions are expected to sustain consumption, while the return of capacity utilization to more normal levels is expected to boost investment.

    The pace of the recovery will, nonetheless, remain uneven across Asia. In China, growth is expected to return to double digits in 2010, with private domestic demand boosted by measures to increase consumption and private investment. This is having positive spillovers for the rest of the region, as Chinese demand boosts imports, particularly of commodities and capital goods. Given this strength in demand, the authorities have begun to stem the very rapid growth of credit in order to safeguard the quality of bank balance sheets. In Japan, private sector demand continues to face severe headwinds despite the recovery in the export sector, and inflation has fallen back into negative territory, requiring the authorities to reiterate their commitment to prolonged policy accommodation.

    Asia’s relatively strong cyclical position may pose near-term risks to this outlook, particularly if bright growth prospects and widening interest rate differentials with advanced economies lead to further capital inflows to the region. These inflows could lead to overheating in some economies and increase their vulnerability to a strong upswing in the credit and asset price cycles, with the propensity for a subsequent abrupt reversal. Although asset-price inflation in Asia has so far been generally contained, the increase in excess liquidity in many regional economies over the course of 2009 raises concerns. Policymakers will need to be attentive to safeguarding the macroeconomy and financial system against the build-up of imbalances in local asset and housing markets.

    Over the medium term, Asia’s main policy challenge will be to ensure that private domestic demand becomes a more prominent engine of growth. Once the adjustment in inventories has run its course, Asia’s exports to advanced economies should moderate somewhat, as domestic demand in these economies is expected to remain below pre-crisis levels, undermining global demand. Even in a best case scenario, China will provide only a partial offset to the weaker demand from advanced economies, given the relatively small size of Chinese consumption and its import of consumer goods. The global crisis has highlighted the importance for Asia of a second, domestic “engine of growth” that can substitute for lost demand from the industrialized world and lessen the impact of external shocks on Asian economies. This private domestic demand will need to be nurtured primarily through a range of structural reforms in the region.

    Indeed, Chapter III suggests that Asia has remained heavily dependent on external demand—more than other regions. Rebalancing toward domestic demand will require many regional economies to act across a range of areas. Some economies may need to increase consumption, others will need to increase investment, and many will need to boost productivity in service sectors. A comprehensive package of measures adopted in the region—including fiscal measures, reforms in product, labor, and financial markets and more exchange rate flexibility—will critically contribute to the rebalancing of global demand.

      Other Resources Citing This Publication