- Joseph Gold
- Published Date:
- March 1990
Legal Effects of Fluctuating Exchange Rates
In his Exchange Rates in International Law and Organization, published by the American Bar Association, the author examined the law relating to the discretionary system of exchange arrangements that has replaced the par value system. In the current system, exchange rates fluctuate, sometimes with volatility. This phenomenon has created new legal problems of considerable importance in both public international law and national law, not all of which have been settled or settled satisfactorily. The present volume discusses some of the major legal effects of fluctuation in both fields of law.
Some of the topics that are discussed include the development and use of units of account, including the SDR and the ECU; adjustments to compensate for fluctuation; maintenance of value; the selection and calculation of exchange rates for legal purposes; the measurement of changes in rates; doctrines to give relief because of changes; and the allocation and sharing of exchange risks.
A revolutionary change in national law, or in the thinking about it, in countries that have or have had hegemonic currencies is abandonment, or proposed abandonment, of the legal dogma that changes in exchange rates for these currencies result from the instability of other currencies. The examination of the consequences of this phenomenon include a critical consideration of the relevant case law in various countries, the reports of law commissions and other influential bodies, and a proposal for a uniform law on foreign money claims in the United States.
A final chapter summarizes the treatment in international and national law of the problems that have arisen and the similarities in the solutions. The chapter concludes with generalizations that can be drawn from the study and with recommendations by the author for further development of the law.
© 1990 International Monetary Fund
Cover design by IMF Graphics Section
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Gold, Joseph, 1912-
Legal effects of fluctuating exchange rates / Joseph Gold.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Foreign exchange—Law and Legislation. 2. Foreign exchange—Law and legislation—European Economic Community countries. 3. Foreign exchange—Law and legislation—Great Britain. 4. Foreign exchange—Law and legislation—United States. I. International Monetary Fund. II. Title.
Address orders to:
International Monetary Fund, Publication Services
700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A.
Telephone: (202) 623-7430
Telefax: (202) 623-7491
This book is a study of changes in the law that have come about as a direct result of the disappearance of the system of fixed exchange rates for currencies established by the original Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, the present freedom of member countries under the Articles to choose their exchange arrangements, and the freedom of these countries to allow the exchange rates for their currencies to fluctuate. Legal consequences of fluctuation determine the scope of the study and not the international law that permits fluctuation. A detailed account of the law that has validated fluctuation appears in the author’s Exchange Rates in International Law and Organization, which was published in 1988 by the Section of International Law and Practice of the American Bar Association. Some treatment of that body of law, however, cannot be avoided for the purposes of the present study. A brief account of some aspects of the international legal environment in which exchange rates fluctuate will be found in Chapter 1 of this book. For the same reason, some features of the European Monetary System, as a regional effort to restrain fluctuation, are examined in Chapter 2. Basic texts and other expository material are appended to these two chapters.
The changes in the law discussed in this study had occurred by the fall of 1990, but no claim is made to comprehensiveness. The topics chosen for discussion seemed to deserve attention because of their importance. Developments in the law that had occurred before the breakdown of the par value system are not examined unless they are directly related to the topics discussed in this volume.
In the first half of the study, the major emphasis is on public international law, including the practice of a number of international organizations. Much attention is given to the use of the SDR and the ECU as units of account for various purposes in the hope that as composite units of account they will fluctuate less in exchange value than single currencies. No unit of account, however, can eliminate the manifold legal problems that arise in international and national law as consequences of the fluctuation of the exchange rates of currencies.
The second half of the study concentrates more on problems of national law. A leading problem in this field is the expression of judicial decisions or arbitral awards in a currency foreign to the forum or in a composite unit of account. This problem is discussed mainly in relation to English and American law, because sterling and the U.S. dollar have been hegemonic currencies in the twentieth century and this role has left a deep impress not only on English and American law but on the law of other countries as well. The fluctuation of exchange rates has brought about revolutionary departures from former law in England, and the process seems likely to be repeated in the United States.
Notwithstanding the emphasis on the law of these two countries for the reason that has been cited, comparisons are made with the law of various other countries to illustrate the existence of different solutions or additional problems.
The distinction between the content of the first and second parts of this study as outlined above is not a rigid one. On the contrary, whenever it seems profitable, a comparison is made between the solutions of international and national law.
A final chapter surveys most of the consequences of the legal problems discussed in the preceding chapters. In addition, an effort is made to deduce some of the general ideas that underlie the problems and the solutions that have been considered in this study.
Something should be said about two problems of terminology. It is common practice in judicial and academic language to speak of the “conversion” of currencies to mean sometimes the exchange of currencies and sometimes calculation of the value of one currency in relation to another when an exchange is not involved. I have confined “conversion” to the exchange of currencies and referred to “translation” when there is calculation but not exchange.1
A more troublesome problem of terminology is the usage of “currency” and “money.” The words can be distinguished so that “currency” refers to a national unit in which national means of payment, namely “money,” are denominated. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws of the United States of America has recommended for adoption by States of the Union a Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act. The word “money” is used throughout the proposed text of the Act. In a long list of definitions, the recommended Uniform Act defines “money”2 but not “currency.” Although “money” is appropriate in most contexts on the basis of the distinction drawn above between “currency” and “money,” there is reason to believe that the Commissioners have not observed this distinction to the fullest extent.3
I too have not observed the distinction. I have preferred in most contexts to refer to “currency,” even when I discuss provisions of the proposed Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act that mention “money.” One reason for my preference is that usually in this study “currency” would be more appropriate if the distinction were being observed. A pedantic adherence to the distinction, however, might create confusion and stimulate unnecessary doubt and dispute. Furthermore, the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund refer throughout to “currency” and nowhere mention “money,” even though the word “monetary”4 appears in the name of the organization and elsewhere in the treaty.5
I acknowledge with gratitude the invaluable help of Patricio Aranda-Coddou, Tobias M.C. Asser, John F. Chown, Lester J. Dally, John Dewhurst, Werner F. Ebke, Juan Javier Negri, Stephen A. Silard, Peter Stern, Amokrane Touami, and Reinhard Welter, who have provided material or answered questions related to this work, but they have no responsibility for any shortcomings in the use I have made of the material or answers. Tobias M.C. Asser, Lester J. Dally, and Philine R. Lachman have been kind enough to read a draft of this book and have commented in detail on it. I have profited from their comments, and the study is undoubtedly better than it would have been without their generous efforts, but again they are not accountable for the outcome.
Rose Bedrossian and Stella Ymar have typed and organized a succession of hand-written drafts, and have converted them into a text that Esha Ray, a paragon among editors, could scrutinize. I acknowledge all three as indispensable partners, to whom I express my thanks not only for their skills but also for their fortitude and cheerfulness.
Finally, as the former General Counsel and Director of the Legal Department, and at present Senior Consultant, of the International Monetary Fund, it is necessary to clarify that the opinions expressed in this book are those of the author and not those of any organizations or other persons in the absence of an express attribution of the opinions to them.
September 30, 1990
This distinction is observed by Helen Gernon Morsicato in Currency Translation and Performance Evaluation in Multinationals (Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Research Press, 1980). She notes that accountants also frequently use the word conversion to refer to both exchanges and calculations without distinction (p. 36).
See Section 12.
For the organization that became the International Monetary Fund, John Maynard Keynes preferred the name International Currency (or Clearing) Union. See The International Monetary Fund 1945-1965: Twenty Years of International Monetary Cooperation, Volume III: Documents, ed. by J. Keith Horsefield (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1969), pp. 3-36.
See, for example, Article I(i), Article VIII, Section 5(c), and Article VIII, Section 7. But the word “monetary” has been deleted by the Second Amendment of the Articles from references to “monetary reserves” even though the concept has not been changed. Note also that the original Articles (Article XIX(d)) defined “currency” to include a list of means of payment.
Short Titles and AbbreviationsArticles, the
The Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, negotiated at the Bretton Woods Conference July 1944, and effective December 27, 1945.Bank, the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank)BIS
Bank for International SettlementsBritish Columbia Report
Report on Foreign Money Liabilities of Law Reform Commission of British Columbia (LRC 65, 1983)CAFs
Currency adjustment factorsCFTC
Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United StatesCME
Chicago Mercantile ExchangeDelors Committee Report
Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union, Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community (1989)EBRD
European Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentEC
European currency unitECU Newsletter
Published by the Istituto Bancario San Paolo di TorinoEIB
European Investment BankEMCF
European Monetary Cooperation FundEMS
European Monetary SystemEnglish Law Commission’s Report
English Law Commission’s Report on Foreign Money Liabilities and Private International Law (Cmnd. 9064, October 1983)ERM
Exchange rate mechanism or exchange rate and intervention arrangements of the EMSEUA
European unit of accountFirst Amendment
Amendment of the IMF’s Articles that took effect on July 28, 1969GATT
General Agreement on Tariffs and TradeICC
International Chamber of CommerceIDA
International Development AssociationIMF
International Monetary FundInternational Monetary Reform
Documents of the Committee on Reform of the International Monetary System and Related Issues (Committee of Twenty) (Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1974)Member (of the IMF)
A country that has accepted membership in the IMF and has undertaken thereby to perform the obligations imposed by the Articles and enjoy the benefits of having done soMIGA
Multilateral Investment Guarantee AgencyMiliangos
Decision of the English House of Lords in Miliangos v. George Frank (Textiles) Ltd.  A.C. 443OCC
Options Clearing CorporationOECD
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentOriginal Articles
The Articles of the IMF in the form that became effective on December 27, 1945 and preceded the two AmendmentsOutline of Reform
Document presented to the IMF’s Board of Governors by its Committee on Reform of the International Monetary System and Related Issues (Committee of Twenty) on June 14, 1974Phlx
Philadelphia Stock ExchangeReport on Second Amendment
Proposed Second Amendment to the Articles of Agreement: A Report by the Executive Directors to the Board of Governors (Washington: International Monetary Fund, March 1976)Restatement
See Third RestatementSDR
Special drawing rightSEC
Securities and Exchange Commission of the United StatesSecond Amendment
Amendment of the IMF’s Articles that took effect on April 1, 1978Selected Decisions
International Monetary Fund, Selected Decisions of the International Monetary Fund and Selected Documents, Eighth Issue, May 10, 1976, and Fifteenth Issue, April 30, 1990 (Washington)Third Restatement
American Law Institute’s Third Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987)UCC
Uniform Commercial Code of the United StatesUniform Foreign-Money Claims Act
Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act drafted by National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and approved and recommended for enactment in all States of the United States at the Annual Conference July 28–August 4, 1989UNCITRAL
United Nations Commission on International Trade LawUPU
Universal Postal UnionWorld Bank
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development