- Kevin Barnes, Ali Mansoor, Benjamin Cohen, and Shinji Takagi
- Published Date:
- September 2003
© 2003 International Monetary Fund
Production: IMF Multimedia Services Division
Cover: Martina Vortmeyer
Figures: Theodore F. Peters, Jr.
Typesetting: Alicia Etchebarne-Bourdin
The IMF and recent capital account crises: Indonesia, Korea, Brazil—[Washington, D.C.]: International Monetary Fund, 2003
Includes bibliographical references.
1. Capital movements—Indonesia. 2. Capital movements—Korea. 3. Capital movements—Brazil. 4. International Monetary Fund—Evaluation. I. International Monetary Fund. Independent Evaluation Office.
Please send orders to:
International Monetary Fund, Publication Services
700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A.
Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Telefax: (202) 623-7201
The following symbols have been used throughout this report:
– between years or months (e.g. 2000–01 or January–June) to indicate the years or months covered, including the beginning and ending years or months;
/ between years (e.g. 2000/01) to indicate a fiscal (financial year).
“Billion” means a thousand million.
Minor discrepancies between constituent figures and totals are due to rounding.
Some of the documents cited and referenced in this report were not available to the public at the time of publication of this report. Thus, they have not been listed in the bibliography. However, under the current policy on public access to the IMF’s archives, some of these documents will become available five years after their issuance. They may be referenced as EBS/YY/NN and SM/YY/NN, where EBS and SM indicate the series and YY indicates the year of issue. Certain other documents are to become available ten or twenty years after their issuance depending on the series.
This report, The IMF and Recent Capital Account Crises, is the second evaluation report produced by the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). The report focuses on the role of the IMF in three recent currency crises in Indonesia (1997–98), Korea (1997–98), and Brazil (1998–99).
The three cases exemplify the new type of balance of payments crisis, characterized by a sudden reversal of capital flows, which are increasingly seen as posing special risks for emerging market countries. All three cases have been the subject of considerable debate both within and outside the IMF and, in revisiting these episodes, this report covers ground that will be familiar to many readers. However, it also brings a fresh perspective because of the IEO’s access to internal IMF documents which cast new light on various aspects of each crisis, both in the buildup to the crisis and in the crisis management phase.
The primary purpose of the evaluation, in keeping with the IEO’s mandate, is to draw lessons for the future. The report therefore recommends a number of steps aimed at making the IMF’s surveillance and program design more effective in the prevention and management of future capital account crises. The report recognizes that many important lessons have already been learned from the cases studied and a number of changes have been made in IMF procedures and policies. The recommendations in the IEO report seek to build on the many steps already taken.
The preparation of the report followed the IEO’s established procedures. A draft issues paper was posted for comments on the IEO’s website (www.imf.org/ieo) and was later revised, on the basis of inputs from a range of groups and individuals, to form the final terms of reference for the evaluation. This was posted on the website and interested parties were invited to submit material relevant to items included in the terms of reference. Several seminars were held to interact with outside experts and stakeholders and comments on early drafts were obtained from staff. The final IEO report, as approved by the Director, was submitted to management for comments and also circulated simultaneously to Executive Directors. The report was discussed in the Executive Board on May 30, 2003, along with comments from management and staff.
In line with IEO procedures, the report, as discussed in the Board, is being published along with the Summing Up of the Executive Board discussion by the Acting Chair and the statements by management and staff to the Board. The staff statement draws attention to positive developments in Indonesia and Brazil in the period following the end of the programs covered by this report. The IEO was precluded from evaluating these developments because our mandate does not allow us to review ongoing programs.
Montek S. Ahluwalia
Independent Evaluation Office
The IMF and Capital Account Crises: Indonesia, Korea, Brazil
The report was prepared by a team headed by Shinji Takagi and including Ali Mansoor, Kevin Barnes, and Benjamin Cohen. The team was assisted by Afonso Bevilaqua, Stephen Grenville, Mohamad Ikhsan, Jai-won Ryou, and Takashi Shiraishi; sections of the report have also benefited from comments and other inputs from Jeffrey Frankel, Takatoshi Ito, Yung Chul Park, and David Peretz. However, the final judgments are the responsibility of the IEO alone. Research assistance from Misa Takebe, Shauqie Azar, Minkyung Kim, and Leandro Rothmuller; administrative support by Annette Canizares, Arun Bhatnagar, and Florence Conteh; and editorial work by Ian McDonald and Esha Ray are gratefully acknowledged.The Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) was established by the International Monetary Fund’s Executive Board in July 2001. The office operates independently of IMF management and at arm’s length from the IMF’s Executive Board. Its mission is to provide objective and independent evaluation of issues related to the IMF’s mandate and thereby support the Executive Board in its governance and oversight responsibilities, to contribute to enhancing the learning culture of the IMF, and to promote understanding of the IMF’s work.
Abbreviations and AcronymsADB
Asian Development BankAPD
Asia and Pacific Department (IMF)APEC
Asia-Pacific Economic CooperationASEAN
Association of South East Asian NationsBCBS
Basel Committee on Banking SupervisionBI
Bank for International SettlementsBLBI
Bank Liquidity from Bank IndonesiaBOK
Bank of KoreaBPK
Supreme Audit Agency (Indonesia)CBA
Currency board arrangementCCL
Contingent Credit Line (IMF)CD
Certificate of depositCPMF
Financial transactions tax (Brazil)EFF
Extended Fund Facility (IMF)EMEAP
Executives’ Meeting of East Asia–Pacific Central BanksERM
Exchange rate mechanismFDI
Foreign direct investmentFSAP
Financial Sector Assessment Program (IMF)FSC
Financial Supervisory Commission (Korea)FSS
Financial Supervisory Service (Korea)G-7
Group of Seven countriesGDP
Gross domestic productIBRA
Indonesian Bank Restructuring AgencyICM
International Capital Markets Department (IMF)IDB
Inter-American Development BankIEO
Independent Evaluation Office (IMF)IFI
International financial institutionIIF
Institute of International FinanceIMF
International Monetary FundINDRA
Indonesia Debt Restructuring AgencyITC
Investment trust company (Korea)JIBOR
Jakarta interbank offered rateKAMCO
Korea Asset Management CorporationKDB
Korea Development BankKDIC
Korea Deposit Insurance CorporationLIBOR
London interbank offered rateLOI
Letter of intent (IMF)LOLR
Lender of last resortMAE
Monetary and Exchange Affairs Department (IMF)1MEFP
Memorandum on economic and financial policies (IMF)MOF
Ministry of financeMOFE
Ministry of Finance and Economy (Korea)NDA
Net domestic assetsNIR
Net international reservesNPL
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentPC
Performance criteria (IMF)PDR
Policy Development and Review Department (IMF)PEDT
Private External Debt Team (Indonesia)PIN
Public Information Notice (IMF)PSBR
Public sector borrowing requirementPSI
Private sector involvementRES
Research Department (IMF)ROSC
Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (IMF)SBA
Stand-By Arrangement (IMF)SBI
Bank Indonesia certificateSDDS
Special Data Dissemination Standard (IMF)SDR
Special drawing right (IMF)SME
Small and medium-sized enterpriseSRF
Supplemental Reserve Facility (IMF)URV
Unit of real value (Brazil)VAT
Western Hemisphere Department (IMF)WTO
World Trade Organization
Effective May 1, 2003, name was changed to Monetary and Financial Systems Department.